Re: [PROPOSAL] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-17 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I would like to propose Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service > stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache > Incubator podling. > > Here is a link to the proposal: >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Us

Re: [DISCUSS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-24 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as > committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings > during the initial proposal stage is "I'm interested" :) Is there some more background available on why the barrier is set this l

Re: [DISCUSS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-24 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Forgot to add the link. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as >> committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings >> during the initial p

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-24 Thread Lieven Govaerts
+1 (non-binding) Lieven On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose > a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service > stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache > I

Re: [DISCUSS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-25 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi, note that one of the WSO2 engineers has already started participating on the usergrid-dev list with some (small) patches. So relax a bit, and give people some time to read the existing docs/code and start interacting with the existing community. Continuing to escalate this topic is not going

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

2013-10-01 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave wrote: > I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant > Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful > APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling. > +1 (non-binding) I hope to be able to contribute to this project dur

Re: Is an android framework good candidate for Apache Incubation?

2013-07-08 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi Yigong, On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:44 AM, yigong liu wrote: > Sorry for the repost. My last email is messed up. > > Is an android framework good candidate for Apache Incubation? > > I have been working on an Android framework(library, service and app) > for connecting android devices (phones and

Re: Build machines: external or colocated?

2011-06-04 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Most of Apache Infrastructure is based on shared resources, and our build > environments are no exception. We currently provide both jenkins and > buildbot > based build systems, and the slaves naturally run jobs for several > projects. > W

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

2017-01-22 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Hi Incubator folk, > >I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal is available at this wiki link: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MXNetProposal?action=recall&

Re: [VOTE] Accept HTrace into the Apache Incubator

2014-11-05 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier in the thread: > >http://s.apache.org/Dk7 > > > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HTrace > > as a new incubator project. > > > >