Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-11-29 Thread Ian Roughley
I'd like to add to what Soren said: we've discussed whether we should include the protocol and the implementation of the protocol in the proposal. What we concluded, is that having everything together would be the simplest for the time being... although I don't think anyone in the discussion ha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-11-29 Thread Ian Roughley
On 11/25/2010 07:35 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> Simple review: the original email was sent by Dan Peterson from his >> google.com address. I imagine that if Google had a problem with it, >> then he wouldn't be working there tomorrow :-D ...

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-11-30 Thread Ian Roughley
On 11/29/2010 06:08 PM, Santiago Gala wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ian Roughley wrote: >> I'd like to add to what Soren said: we've discussed whether we should >> include the protocol and the >> implementation of the protocol in the proposal. What w

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Ian Roughley
th, > protobuf, protobuf-format-java, protostuff, stringtemplate, websocket, whack, > xpp3 > > = Cryptography = > > We use standard crypto library methods available in java.security.*. Wave > federation plans to uses > encryption for sending deltas to remote Wave serve