On 11/24/10 3:18 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:02, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:16, Benson Margulies wrote:
I am nothing if not chronically disingenuous.
My first concern in responding
On 11/24/10 7:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The premise of this discussion is that running Apache projects are
*permitted* to engage in real-time communications, so long as they
take due care to avoid community problems of exclusion and closed
decision making.
Did you see Greg's e-mail?
"Just b
[X] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 2/11/11 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/ ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---
On 5/31/11 2:57 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Is there a quick way to check the diversity of commits to a podling? I
mentor one where the ratio of commits between one individual and the
rest of the universe seems to be tending toward infinity, and I'd like
to check before pointing this out.
http:/
On 6/6/11 6:17 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-06 18.06:
The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
> crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to
force
> The Apache Foundation to take the project.
>
How?
On 6/6/11 6:47 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote on 2011-06-06 18.40:
Should The ASF made responsible for every comments made on the Internet
by people who are not even remotely connected to The ASF ?
no, and I didn't say that. Again, I just wanted to point ou
On 6/8/11 6:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Flume for incubation (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding).
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@
On 6/27/11 12:37 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Deft to be an Apache Incubator project. Deft
is a non-blocking, asynchronous, event driven high performance web
framework running on the JVM.
Here's a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/inc
On 6/28/11 7:49 AM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
+1
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
F
On 7/4/11 12:29 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi Mark...
As they stated in "Relationships with Other Apache Products" that
they would consider such reuse of some of Apache Mina components. But
IMHO, this is not the a blocking issue to go forward with the proposal
as such technical detail c
On 7/4/11 6:04 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
Thanks Mark!
To continue the discussion regarding if it make sense to implement such a
piece, like Deft, solely on it's own:
Things that justifies Deft's existence (In my very humble opinion):
* The simplicity
* The learning curve (e.g compared t
On 7/4/11 4:36 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
Hi Mark,
This is absolutely not a dumb question. Deft is not based on Apache MINA.
Instead it's using raw Java NIO (without any level of
indirection/abstractions). The reason for this is basically to cut down the
overhead and to keep it as simple as p
On 7/4/11 6:38 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
On 4 jul 2011, at 18.31em, Mark Struberg wrote:
I have not looked at Deft a lot, but only from a 10.000 feet point ;)
It is just that such things like Filters, etc which are available for Mina
already used to be very helpful for lots of projects.
D
On 7/5/11 12:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Sorry to interrupt this technical discussion, but I believe that now
we are ready to go for a [VOTE] ?
Was thinking the same...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
On 7/5/11 12:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Deft for incubation (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additi
[X] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation [ ]
(binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@
Same request that Alan : I'm part of the IPMC, and I don't have access
to this file.
Could someone grant me the needed karma ? Thanks !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel that I
need to bring up a vote to put the issue to bed once an
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
JSecurity was deemed as a potential naming conflict risk (much in the same
way Ki is now), so we dropped it, and finally came to a vote to change the
name to Ki. But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to
a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go throu
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
>> Apache JSecurity/Ki and extended Apache Community,
>>
>> The final results are in for the Apache JSecurity/Ki project rename vote.
>> Here are the results:
>>
>> Apache Shiro: 16 votes
>> Apache Aseca: 7 votes
>>
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:42 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the community to focus on this
thing, without
Scott Comer wrote:
i would think that if there is someone contributing to the project
that the
community would recognize and add them themselves. it isn't up to the
mentors to do anything except perhaps suggest they consider it if they're
being really thick about it.
A bit too convoluted a sente
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I know my request might be a bit unusual, but is somebody here
preparing an idea for implementing the Google Wave Protocol? I might
want to follow, if somebody does.
You may ask Bernd Fondermann about that. He has started a project called
Vysper (http
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
You may ask Bernd Fondermann about that. He has started a project called
Vysper (http://mina.apache.org/vysper) which is a XMPP server
Unfortunatly this link leads to an quite empty page.
yes. Try this one (outdated):
http://cwiki.apache.org/labs/vysper
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We have in this proposal a lot of people who are not felix committers and
who are not even apache committers at all.
They want to work on some code and create a community around it. The way
the ASF works means that the incubator is the right place to do so. The
only othe
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I am calling upon the Mentors (Alan, Paul, Emmanuel,
I'm not anymore a mentor of this project. I step down 5 or 6 months ago.
Just FYI.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
--
+1
Greg Stein wrote:
Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as
it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software
Foundation.
The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software
Foundation to remove the overhead of having to run its own
corp
Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi guys,
What's the take of other mentors and the IPMC on podlings practicing RTC?
I'm asking because some seem to see it as a blocker for graduation whereas I
see it much more as a development methodology with little community impact
and therefore no real influence on gradu
Michael Wechner wrote:
Ian Boston schrieb:
not least because committed mistakes demand fixing by the committer
and then anyone who can fix the bug. The only downside is that
occasionally trunk wont build/run and if trunk is close to production
that probably matters.
I think another downsi
==
None of the initial committers are paid by their employer, nor do they
represent their employer in any activity related to JPPF.
== Sponsors ==
Champion
* Emmanuel Lecharny (elecharny at apache dot org)
Nominated Mentors
We are currently looking for mentors within the community.
Spons
On 8/17/10 8:23 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
+1
You have worked hard to get to this point, having survived the release
process, two name changes, and community building exercises.
You also have my +1. It was a long graduation, but at the end, the team
get The Apache way large and long. Go !
On 8/18/10 12:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
I'm with Stefano there: I do contest the view that svn is the
release,
You can contest, but the fact is that a release is just a revision in
the SVN trunk, not a package you deliver, AFAIU. I suggest that you read
carefully this : http://www.apache.o
On 8/18/10 1:03 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Yes, the name changes were difficult to deal with, ...
It was very interesting that the team didn't exploded after such an
unpleasant experience !
But consider that it could have been much worse : what if you have
picked 'Dalvik' for the project name
On 8/18/10 1:15 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
In other word, the release *is* the SVN revision that has been voted.
Bzzt. The release package may contain files not found in svn. See httpd
releases for examples. That is why the document you referenced avoids
discussion of svn; it's the actual tarbal
On 9/9/10 9:33 PM, James Carman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
The formation of your community is a BIG DEAL. Not something to
casually sweep under the rug.
Partitioning the community between users and devs makes it very
difficult to establish a large, viable, sustai
On 11/19/10 11:52 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
...if the ISIS developer/users/mentors/community decide to run a regular
Skype meeting to meet each other electronically assuming
+) that the meeting is announced on the dev list
On 1/31/12 3:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Mess
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope spectra is wider than Shiro. Actually, Syncope *could* use
Shiro.
I have a Q : Can't it be a bit
On 1/31/12 11:44 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 31/01/2012 11:31, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope
On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another committer to the ros
On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another committer to the ros
On 2/1/12 1:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Dear Proposed Syncope mentors:
Please post messages on this thread indicating your prior experience
as mentors,
Does mentors have to have any experience ? Is this a new policy for
being a mentor on an incubator project, or something you just are
inter
On 2/7/12 9:41 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all ASF mates,
I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache Syncope.
Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and
will be closed on February 10th (Fri) at 9:00 am CET.
+ 1 (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel
On 2/8/12 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb wrote:
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton wrote:
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or Maven.
I know the problem with .asc.md5 and
[X] +1 Accept PDFBox as a new podling
A must have !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
+1 Emmanuel Lecharny (non-binding)
May be I missed a step... I have been Ack'd on jan, 20 as an incubator
PMC member. Any heads up ?
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apach
Endre Stølsvik wrote:
Why should this discussion be moved into a Apache-private realm, and
not just stay fully public, so that I can watch the proceedings? This
is an interesting discussion.
Can we please keep the Incubator ML focused ???
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www
+1 !
Daniel Kulp wrote:
After 20 months in the incubator, 6 releases complete and 2 more on the
way shortly, several new committers, and too much email traffic :-), the
Apache CXF community (with support from our mentors) feels that we are
ready to graduate to an official top level project at
Tony Stevenson wrote:
Good day,
Hi
102M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/directory
we have exited the incubator 3 years ago ... This directory can be
archived or removed at will.
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi Alex,
Sounds great. The JSecurity team has had an identity management
server in our heads for quite a while. Indeed much of the current
framework reflects flexibility that was designed into it with the
intention of making an identity server an easier task. We also plan
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm beginning to regret not slogging through all those threads about
the IP
checks in relation to security. Ok, I'm actually glad that
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 5:27 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Isn't there something that states that an incubating project needs to
be novel or provide something that's not already provided by another
librar
James Carman wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's no uniqueness requirement AFAIK. Any kind of project can be
proposed even if there already exist multiple implementations of a similar
technology here at the ASF and abroad.
Perhaps
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Sure, that sounds good to me. I'll update the proposal...
Then maybe JSECURITY for Jira too might be good. Not sure... Depends if
we will have many sub-projects, which might be a good idea, regarding
the various funtionalities.
wdyt ?
--
--
cordialement, regards,
E
Les Hazlewood wrote:
I prefer JSEC for Jira just because that is what we use now. It has grown
on me ;)
If any sub projects come , then JSECSUBA, JSECSUBB, JSECSUBC, etc feel a
little more digestible (at least in length) than JSECURITY-SUBA, etc.
Yep. We have the same on Directory : DIRSERV
+1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Relevant information can be found in:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JSecurityProposal
Regards,
Alan
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
To
Hi,
we may need some moderators for the three mailing lists.
I'm ok to be one of them. Anyone else (if the list is not already set ?)
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
--
Hi Martijn,
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I would
therefore continue maintaining the old jsecurity code, and release
those outside the incubator, just as normal business for your project.
There are options. Maintaining the old repo can be tough, as the
repository will be different, and make merges
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This work too. Depends on the existing user's base, I guess ?
Which was in the thousands for Wicket at the time, with numerous
systems in production.
and it makes perfect sense to follow your way in this case. How many
users does JSecurity has ?
Regarding th
Les Hazlewood wrote:
I don't know the exact usage, but I'm sure it is in lower thousands -
many people use our .jars directly, but probably many more use it via
3rd party plugins (Grails plugin, etc) that is built on top of
JSecurity.
It sounds as if waiting at the last possible second to move f
Hi,
I think that you can get it, as soon as a moderator of a ML or a PMC
member, by requesting ezlm for a list of the subscibers and counting them.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...How to count the number of the
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Hi all,
Hi !
This move to the incubation has raised some argumentation.
One reason for this expressed in [3], stating that the code is developed
on ASF homeland:
"...BTW, why do you need to go through incubation? All the code was
developed in the ASF. It's ASL.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The following reports are still missing from [1]:
Composer
log4php
Pig
RAT
River
Shindig
TripleSoup
Hama
Martijn
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2008
I have added JSecurity to the list, and I also injected the monthly
report for it.
Thanks.
--
--
c
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just so everyone understands this in context, the objection above is
moot
because...
No, it's not. Anything that creates an impetus for a podling to get
out
[X] +1 Accept VCL into Incubator
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niall Pemberton wrote:
This is a slight majority (of binding votes) for accepting the
proposed change, but given the clear lack of consensus and the
concerns voiced about that, I unfortunately need to conclude that this
issue should be tabled until better consensus is reached.
If this was
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wherever the additional license files are placed, they need to be
referenced from the main LICENSE file.
I'm not sure where you get this from. This is the first time I hear
this requirement.
the
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm..
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under "monthly" at
h
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
The info has been updated since then.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
Ian Holsman wrote:
Ian, since you are the one driving this... would you mind working with
the project team on improving the proposal? ...and then consider a
re-submit?
at the moment we have 4 '+1's (including mine) and one -1, and another
~45 hours to go.
You have my +1.
Even if I understa
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
JSecurity: I really don't need to go follow URLs into SVN (or tracking down
e-mails as with some others) when assembling the report. Please follow the
practice of putting your report in the Wiki.
I'm happy
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
Just as I said : write down the report (either as a simple mail, or in SVN),
and when validated by the team, then push the co
Jim, I would be pleased to pass you the batton. You most certainly will be
a better mentor than I could be.
Le mardi 13 septembre 2016, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> If you think I would be of help as a mentor, add me too...
>
> Understand if we are getting to too large a number though.
>
> > On Sep
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
> > Jim, I would be pleased to pass you the batton. You most certainly will
> be
> > a better mentor than I could be
>
> With al
77 matches
Mail list logo
