Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

[x] +1 Accept Aries for incubation Cheers Daniel On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call > a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good > discussion with a few changes to the proposal in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zeta Components (issue tracker)

actually blogs are done using apache roller as you may figure from the below URL. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote: >> ...I read on the infra pages, that our website is required to be generated >> static HTML co

Re: Call for mentors: Zeta Components

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Kore Nordmann wrote: >> On 01/05/10 12:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>>... If you check the current roster of mentors you'll see that several of >>> us are "serial mentors" already busy with several p

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BennuProposal Cheers Daniel S. Haischt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bennu, a Router, Firewall & Wi-Fi perimeter

as a follow up ... I did add the following child pages to the Bennu proposal draft in December 2007 as a result of feedback I got from others: * /BennuBackgroundInfo (was part of the initial proposal) * /BennuFaq * /BennuMissionStatement Noel J. Bergman wrote: I spoke with Cliff Skolnick abo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator

Bill Stoddard wrote: [x] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 (non-binding) Cheers Daniel S. Haischt Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote o

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

would SVK be an option? This would allow to re-use the already existing SVN infrastracture. No need for changes to the ASF infrastructure... On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > El jue, 14-02-2008 a las 12:37 +0100, Dirk-Willem van Gulik escribió: > > > O

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Seems like people weren't interested in SVK but solely in Git. Otherwise this thread would have come to an end pretty soon without the need of all the FUD cause I suggested/asked to use SVK some days ago already. It doesn't figure why infrastructure stuff needs to be discussed in such a intensity

Re: [VOTE] Incubate JSecurity Project

+1 Cheers Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Relevant information can be found in: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JSecurityProposal Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [PROPOSAL] VCL: Virtual Computing Lab

Hi there, I am kind of interested but my interest goes beyond the provisioning and management of bare metal machines or systems with an installed virtual machine hypervisor. For example I am interested in provisioning and managing router/firewall and Wi-Fi platforms as well ranging from embedded s

Re: Continuous Build environment?

-> http://www.apache.org/dev/ -> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/groupSummary.action If Etch has not been already added to Continuum you might need to talk to the infra folks... Cheers Daniel On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone has information