Pielage (Payara Services)
4. Gui Chulin (translation)
5. Yi Zhao (translation)
6. Liyuan Li (translation)
7. CunHui Lin (translation)
8. Lei Cao (translation)
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz
=== Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz
* Emmanuel Lécharny
* Ate Doum
This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows
[] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ...
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscr
On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed
before I make this so?
Without further feedback I'm going to assume lazy consensus and wil
p, we need to all be comfortable with cutting bait on it.
I agree, and I think it is a good suggestion to switch back to a 3 monthly
reporting schedule to keep the IPMC in the loop on progress (or lack thereof).
Ate
John
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-25 12:25
On 2016-09-28 00:50, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Sorry, Bertrand, not Ate, though I feel they're in sync.
In this case, you felt right :-)
Syncing with the mentors would have been appreciated, but I also
see no harm done in Roman's trying to help out.
Thanks Roman!
Ate
Gj
On Wednesday, Sep
On 2016-10-03 19:22, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi all
Heve sameone requested the ML at infra? I didn't find a issue for it.
Bertrand already did, directly (see this thread first email from Bertrand).
As I understand it, it doesn't require a JIRA issue.
FYI: I'm busy otherwise until tomorrow. The
yet [1]
Regards, Ate
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
John
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal
Thanks for catching this Justin!
I just checked and this same issue was also present in the Streams
0.3-incubating release, so we overlooked it the previous time as well.
We'll fix these and then come back with a new release candidate.
Ate
On 2016-11-02 04:21, jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Steve,
I have a few additional notes below.
As a separate note: can you check your mail reply quote/indent settings?
Sometimes your replies (like below) are not using any, which makes it very
difficult to distinguish your reply from the original message.
Thanks, Ate
On 2016-11-10 21:27, sblack
sponsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Streams
Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed
to serve as the initial members of the Apache Streams Project:
* Stephen D Blackmon
*
+1 (binding)
One improvement to consider for the next release is appending the
license for Knockout (MIT) to the embedded LICENSE in the build ko4j
jar artifact, as is required for distributing this artifact.
And another is maybe generating a more explicit artifact name for ko4j.
Thanks,
Ate
O
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 2017-11-14 20:47, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1 (binding) over here as well again.
LieGrue,strub
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017, 10:47:50 GMT+1, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
...I'd
like to ask you to hold the
+1, carrying over my mentor and binding vote from the netbeans dev list
vote thread
Ate
On 2017-11-21 14:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
The release hash is:
1189b293cecfd5236cf18df2c2bd0f6b414dab75
...
https://dist.apache.org/
On 2018-01-22 12:36, John D. Ament wrote:
I'm inclined to vote -1 at this point as well.. I want confirm that the
list of issues Justin raised have been entered in your backlog. To me, the
minimum amount of work that has to be done to convert to a +1 is:
- Remove the binary zip files from t
+1
Regards, Ate
On 2018-02-19 11:45, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
The FreeMarker community has discussed [1] and voted [2] positively on
graduating to a top level project (TLP). The resolution for the graduation
has been proposed and discussed in this list [3].
Information about FreeMarker
I'm inclined to vote positive on this RC1, overall looks great!
- verified the MD5 and SHA1, and PGP signatures with the ASC files.
- executed rat check (ant rat) and verified the report.
- build and run the source (using JDK8), and all seems fine.
However I still have two questions:
a) nbbuild
also don't see how it serves any purpose and only will trigger
unnecessary warnings or worries by users or checker tools.
My recommendation is to get rid of those GPL license files.
Regards,
Ate
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 21 May 2018 3:54 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm i
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 2014-12-09 12:49, Kostas Tzoumas wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Flink community voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote passed with
27 +1s (including 12 +1s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.
Here is the vote thread in the Dev list:
http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.10
+1 (binding)
On 2014-12-19 06:29, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
and is a
-1 (binding)
Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I noticed:
- binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not contain the
required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
I also encountered build test failures.
For the next rele
+1 (binding)
Very interesting.
And if you still like or need another mentor, I'd be willing to help out.
Ate
On 2015-02-20 06:38, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
Hi Everyone,
OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally
suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this com
On 2015-03-19 07:55, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/KWE
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
and is also i
On 2015-06-19 09:15, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to
accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project.
The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail.
The VOTE is open for at least the next 7
+1 binding
Regards,
Ate
On 2018-08-27 05:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin into the
Apache Incubator.
The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text form as
well.
This vote will run at least 72 hours. P
On 18/11/2018 18.01, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
I believe it is at least 5 days (or an X number, not sure what the X should
be officially) and with three +1 votes.
Release Votes SHOULD remain open for at least 72 hours:
http://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
There is
+1 binding
- signature and sha1 files correct (both source and bin distribution)
- LICENSE and NOTICE files look fine (both source and bin distribution)
- source dist contents matches with content of git 10.0-vc3 tag
(except LICENSE/NOTICE files, as documented)
- binary starts up OK (no further
+1 binding
- signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired)
- LICENSE and NOTICE files correct
- source dist contents matches with contents of git release-1.6 tag
Regards,
Ate
On 18/11/2018 05.47, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Hi.
The NetBeans incubating community has just app
-256 checksum file is
added.
(see also the vote thread for Netbeans 10.0 and Bertrand's likewise
comment and temporary change of vote).
Ate
On 18/11/2018 22.29, Ate Douma wrote:
+1 binding
- signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired)
- LICENSE and NOTICE files co
Thanks, Laszlo.
sha256 checksum checked to be correct.
Hereby reconfirming my previous +1 (binding)
Regards,
Ate
On 20/11/2018 19.56, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
SHA256 checksum has been provided. I've not removed the SHA1 ones from
this staging area, but wont move them over to the final release a
Now provided sha256 checksum checked to be correct.
Hereby changing my vote back to +1 (binding)
Regards,
Ate
On 19/11/2018 15.40, Ate Douma wrote:
Sorry about overlooking this before, but as Henk P. Penning indicated
release artifacts now MUST be accompanied by a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512
-1 (binding)
because the Maven groupId is using org.netbeans as prefix instead of
org.apache.netbeans, and there is no need to keep using org.netbeans for
this *new* artifact.
I've already raised and discussed this on the Netbeans dev@ list were we
agreed that it is better to cancel the vote for
On 02/04/2019 13.58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel...
I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for
mentors to catch issues in the first one without both
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote:
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to
cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw
the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view,
it was time to g
On 02/04/2019 16.53, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote:
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I
tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the
community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was
ial members of the Apache NetBeans Project:
* Anton Epple
* Antonio Vieiro
* Aristides Villarreal
* Arunava Sinha
* Ate Douma
* Attila Kelemen
* Bertrand Delacretaz
* Bruno Flávio
* Bruno Souza
* Christian Lenz
* Constantin Drabo
* David Heffelfinger
* Daniel Gruno
* Dusan Balek
* Ei
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
