+1 (binding)
Ate
On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote:
I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as th
On 08-09-14 06:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
it looks like September report is almost done,
except the following podlings:
* Streams
[ ](streams) Matt Franklin
[ ](streams) Ate Douma
[ ](streams) Craig McClanahan
If there's any chance the above mentor
of the Apache Airavata Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Airavata Project:
Aleksander Slominski
Ate Douma
the scope of
responsibility of the Apache Wookie Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Wookie Project:
* Scott Wilson
* Ate Doum
Franklin (mfranklin at apache dot org) - Apache Member
* Craig McClanahan (craigmcc at apache dot org) - Apache Member
* James Snell (jmsnell at apache dot org?) - Apache Committer
* Ate Douma (ate at apache dot org) - Apache Member
* Ryan Baxter (rbaxter at apache dot org) - Apache C
== Initial Committers ==
* Matt Franklin (mfranklin at apache dot org) - Apache Member
* Craig McClanahan (craigmcc at apache dot org) - Apache Member
* James Snell (jmsnell at apache dot org?) - Apache Committer
* Ate Douma (ate at apache dot org) - Apache Member
* Ryan Baxter (rbaxter at
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too.
Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to
trigger that, if even needed?
Thanks, Ate
On 03/05/2013 08:15 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Development Tools ...
Those projects would hav
On 03/05/2013 01:47 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too.
Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to
trigger that, if even needed?
After making source changes, then i just go to
https://cms.
+1 (binding)
Regards, Ate
On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
Open is open for at least 72h an
On 06/05/2013 04:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
+1 @Marcel
Any links for the draft proposal so people can assess if they can help or
not ?
He is asking for help (Champion) to create such a draft :)
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013 11:50 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
>
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or othe
+1
Ate
On 30/11/10 07:52, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
The earlier discussion thread can be
.
-
We are looking forward to your feedback and suggestions.
Kind regards,
Ate Douma
- COPY OF PROPOSAL FROM http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal -
= Apache Rave Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Apache Rave is A new WEb And SOcial Mashup Engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box
On 24/02/11 09:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the
Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the
Directory ===
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave
=== Issue Tracking ===
We intend to make use of Jira for issue tracking.
Proposed JIRA key: JIRA-RAVE
=== Other Resources ===
None right now.
== Initial Committers ==
Names of initial committers with affiliation and current ASF st
Here is my own vote: +1
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 25/02/11 01:08, Ate Douma wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape so
I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal
The vote passes with a total of
+1
On 04/23/2011 01:57 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all ASF mates,
I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache OGNL.
Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and
will be closed on April 26th (Tue) at 12:00 am CET.
Many thanks in advance to everyone will take pat
+1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
Ate
On 05/02/2011 11:32 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to call a vote to accept Airavata for entry into the Apache
Incubator. The proposal thread can be found at [1] and the proposal text is at
[2]
[ ] +1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
[ ] -1 Do
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
A week has passed since this vote started and but still no feedback so far.
Possibly it was drowned by the Accumulo discussions, but now that has passed...
It would be very appreciated if one or more of the IPMC members could spare a
little time to review this podling release candidate, and cas
o be better populated before this release can go out.
Please see my above comment: I think this release candidate *is* in compliance
(and pretty good at it imo) with the rules for the NOTICE/LICENSE files.
Thanks again for your feedback,
Ate
Upayavira
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:07 AM, &
+1
On 10/11/2011 11:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
As discussed, the PhoneGap project would like to enter the Incubator
under the Apache Callback name (potential alternative names to be
discussed during incubation). The initial proposal has been well
received and there are no major open issues
Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator
PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available
at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal
A quick overview of Wookie is:
Wookie is a Java server application that allows you to
+1
BTW: not sure if my vote is "binding" as I received no formal feedback yet
concerning my IPMC membership (but saw it being ACK by board).
Ate
Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache
Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
The f
Hi Noel,
I didn't receive one.
Ate
On 02/15/2010 05:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I have sent an e-mail directly to everyone who is officially on the
Incubator PMC. If you did NOT receive that e-mail, and believe that you
should be on the PMC, please notify me, via e-mail here.
Thank you.
On 02/15/2010 05:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I didn't receive one.
Check your @apache.org e-mail. That is the address to which it went, and
you were definitely on the list.
Unless mail forwarding is broken, I should receive it on this email account.
Until now I go
On 03/23/2010 01:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 20, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
At the Central repository we are restricting the inclusion of external
repositories because this generally creates a mess. This is being
enforced on new artifacts coming in so I would recommend you do not
Thanks for the reply Brian, this is much relief.
However in your initial response your wording clearly indicated the new policy
already being enforced, up to:
"[...] your artifacts will end up blocked."
A little less restrictive description could have prevented this
misunderstanding...
I think
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the
podling due to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to ratify this decision. Please vote on
terminating the WSRP4J p
The vote for the termination of the WSRP4J podling passes with 9 binding +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
Tally of the binding +1 votes:
Ate Douma
Ralph Goers
Carsten Ziegler
Bertrand Delacretaz
ant elder
Davanum Srinivas
Martijn Dashorts
Niclas Hedhman
Luciano Resende
I'm not all to fam
will be made read-only and the
wsrp4j mailing lists closed down shortly.
This email therefore very well might be the last one delivered to these lists.
With kind regards,
Ate Douma
On behalf of the Apache Portals PMC
-
To
On 04/20/2010 01:44 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the "standard" procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term "Retire" has bette
+1
Regards, Ate
On 10/11/10 16:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
I think we're ready to vote on the
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StanbolProposal now, copy included
below.
This is TPFKAF - The Project Formerly Known As FOO.
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept Stanbol for incubation
[
+1
Regards, Ate
On 23/11/10 21:16, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hello all,
We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
The draft proposal is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
A wave is a hosted, live, co
+1
Ate
On 11/07/2011 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They
even went
ting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we
have
received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev
-
VOTE: http://s.apache.org/Czr
RESULT: http://s.apache.org/yIQ
IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
Ate Douma: +1
Ross Gardler: +1
Release notes:
http:/
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 01/12/2012 04:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
and missing mentors, by having the Champion act as the main liaison
be
On 01/17/2012 10:41 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
expe
On 01/23/2012 10:30 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
On 1/23/12 3:29 PM, "sebb" wrote:
On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.7-incubating.
We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as w
On 01/23/2012 10:56 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/23/2012 10:30 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
On 1/23/12 3:29 PM, "sebb" wrote:
On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.7-incub
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this
policy and are quite happy with it. It's also
On 01/29/2012 03:15 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted t
On 01/29/2012 09:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
this
On 01/30/2012 10:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 30 January 2012 09:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
...2) Fixed election schedule: On some schedule (e.g. annually),
nominations are opened, including potentially the current chair, and a
vot
On 02/03/2012 06:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
+1 on this. Work the bugs out before everyone transitions.
+1 on that
Ate
Karl
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to track.]
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mattmann, Chr
On 02/03/2012 08:35 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:13 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at
On 02/06/2012 01:41 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:26:47PM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It might be worthwhile to require 3 ASF members on the initial release,
2 on the next, 1 on the following and then trust the committee to follow
the established precedent.
+1
In
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this page),
but the release FAQ [1] makes it sound like you need the header, if you assume
your templates are source:
On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this
page), but the release
On 02/06/2012 03:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[legal-discuss@?]
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
Would it be acceptable for these files to *not* have licence headers in them?
Going further, you may want to explicitly declare that downstream
users have the right to di
On 02/06/2012 07:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, "sebb" wrote:
...
Perhaps the answer to "Why is a licensing header necessary?"
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-heade
+1, good luck!
Ate
On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE],
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 02/09/2012 04:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka Zi
On 02/09/2012 05:54 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be done...
Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's
just an assumption AFAICS
On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates and
see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate
Thanks many times Noel!
This also makes (for me) voting for Jukka again a proper process.
I'm therefore reconfirming my earlier retracted vote for Jukka, +1
Ate
On 02/10/2012 03:31 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said "it looks like the remaining f
eived 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev -
VOTE: http://s.apache.org/U8G
RESULT: http://s.apache.org/Fcv
IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
Ate Douma: +1
Ross Gardler: +1
Release notes:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.8-incubating/CHANGEL
y responsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of
responsibility of the Apache Rave Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Rave Project:
*
+1 (binding)
On 02/27/2012 01:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011.
Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC
members, and shows a steady growth of community and
On 02/28/2012 01:46 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
1st of all, and I speaking about myself here, I believe this is
partially my fault cause I am one of the mentors of Sqoop and I should have
spotted such thing before moving the vote to general@
I totally agree with Alex, more specifi
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
They remain.
Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is
our
determination, and is our Right.
Sorry but I don't th
On 02/29/2012 03:52 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
They remain.
Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is
our
det
After 72+ hours this vote has passed with the following tally of 13 votes in
total, including +11 binding IPMC member votes:
+1:
Ross Gardler*
Chris Mattmann*
Arje Cahn
Hadrian Zbarcea*
Ate Douma*
Alex Karasulu*
Jukka Zitting*
Alan D. Cabrera*
Jean-Baptiste Onofré*
Niall Pemberton*
Henry
On 03/11/2012 08:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
-8<---
[ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below)
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling
--
+
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 04/10/2012 03:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't care
-1: do not accep
I haven't seen anyone respond to this yet and I'm in a tight spot myself to make
time for it.
I'll try to free up some by tomorrow though, please accept my apologies for the
delay.
Ate
On 04/22/2012 06:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Sorry to cross post here, but I think we need to get
leaning this up a bit further.
In addition, those samples modules also have additional NOTICE and LICENSE files
in their src/main/resources folders, but AFAIK these are not or no longer
used/bundled in the build artifact. Possibly outdated/leftover?
IMO none of the above really are release blocke
Dave should mail his incubator wiki id here and request being added to the wiki
ContributersGroup [1].
Once added to this page (by an incubator wiki admin) Dave can add/edit wiki
pages himself.
Ate
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup
On 06/19/2012 11:28 AM, Ross Gardler wr
+1 (binding, as well as a late Airavata PPMC Mentor vote)
Ate
On 06/18/2012 12:27 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Apache Airavata (Incubating) is pleased to call for a vote on the following
Apache Airavata 0.3-incubating release candidate artifacts.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC membe
Hi Suresh,
I looked at the two issues raised and IMO these do not pose as blockers for this
release, so +1 from me on this release candidate (binding and Mentor)
More feedback below.
Regards, Ate
On 08/01/2012 03:46 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Hi All,
The VOTE is called for a lazy consensus an
David Sean Taylor wrote:
On Oct 23, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
That is a very good question. I do know that we did a portal
evaluation earlier this year and every vendor was planning on having
WSRP 2.0 support during this year. The spec was finally approved this
year.
I seem to re
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Ate,
Thanks very much for your detailed reply. I'll comment on what's
specific to the incubating status.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...The problem of course is that WSRP4J still is in incubation and to
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Ate,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...Does that patent issue mean that an ASF release of the WSRP4J would
not be safe from a legal point of view?...
Or is it just that users might be afr
l-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-asterixdb-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccan_yf5xzo8qv_yk-p41m+tppv_y2dynehc_keujwxpem_1l...@mail.gmail.com%3E
with result
Binding +1s:
Murtadha Hubail
Till Westmann (IPMC)
Yingyi Bu
Abdullah Alamoudi
Ate Douma (IPMC)
Mike Carey
Chris A. Mattmann (IPMC)
Ian Maxon
Non-bind
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Incubator PMC report for November 2015
* Ready to graduate
- AsterixDB
While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so I
think it shouldn't be listed as such.
Ate (AsterixDB mentor)
On 2015-11-10 23:59, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Incubator PMC report for November 2015
* Ready to graduate
- AsterixDB
While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation
I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with bundled
binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that:
For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and
copyright year statement, to be compliant with ASL 2.0, section 4.d [1]
However Justin (se
piaro (2016-01-16), and Michael Blow (2016-03-28)
have been added as committers and PPMC members
AsterixDB's community passed a supporting vote with 26 +1 votes (3 of those
were from the podling's mentors Chris Mattmann, Henry Saputra, and Ate
Douma) and no 0 or -1 votes [2].
The proposed b
On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate
any code from anywhere on plugins.netbeans.org to anyone el
On 2016-09-14 21:43, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate
any code from
On 2016-09-14 21:49, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
I can't wait for that to happen! In the meantime, can we call NetBeans by
its real name: NetBeans, with an uppercase N and an uppercase B? Shall we
all start maintaining that, i.e., using the correct name, which is NetBeans
or, better yet, Apache NetB
On 2016-09-15 14:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
been addressed so far and would prevent us
27:11 +0200
From: Ate Douma
To: d...@streams.incubator.apache.org
As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html
[ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
[
eneral@
Ate
John
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:37 AM Ate Douma wrote:
FYI, I've started below vote to retire Apache Streams, after I first
initiated a
[discuss] thread more than a week ago, which resulted in zero feedback.
Ate
(Streams mentor)
Forwarded Message
Subj
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote:
Ate,
Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Right.
Thanks for pointing this out John.
I've never before had t
7;d be happy to postpone/cancel
the retirement VOTE for now.
I suggest to head over to d...@streams.incubator.apache.org, let us know
what you can and will do for the project, and see how that works out.
Regards, Ate
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Do
read for the release candidate on
d...@streams.incubator.apache.org
Kind regards, Ate
Steve Blackmon
sblack...@apache.org
On September 19, 2016 at 10:25:16 AM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu
<mailto:a...@douma.nu>) wrote:
On 2016-09-19 17:09, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> I am sorry to be reading t
ms 2.0 community has happened.
Thanks!
Benjamin
--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
*From: *apache <mailto:sblack...@apache.org>
*Sent: *Friday, September 23, 2016 4:15 PM
*To: *Ate Douma <mailto:a...@douma.nu>; d...@streams.incubator.apache.org
<mailt
, Ate
On 2016-09-19 17:07, Ate Douma wrote:
As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for
retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences
compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retierement guide link below).
The most notable difference i
On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases
contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list.
Hi GeertJan,
I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO there really isn't so much
contradictory advic
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed
before I make this so?
Ate
On 2016-09-23 19:51, Suneel Marthi wrote:
-
On 2016-09-25 12:15, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases
contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list.
Hi GeertJan,
I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO
On 2016-09-25 17:20, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
and not all committers are required to commit :-)
That is interesting. Can you explain more about that?
What I meant to say is that at the ASF we also value and honour merit based on
things
On 2016-09-25 17:45, Ross Gardler wrote:
You seem to have taken my comment as an indication that I have concerns one
way or the other. That is not the case.
What I'm saying is that to make a
case for extra budget there needs to be solid justification that a move to
ASF will help the community
erning the process for assigning Suneel as mentor, can we assume lazy
consensus and just 'make it so' in a few days, if nobody objects?
Thanks, Ate
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can&#
Hi Mark,
On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote:
Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days of
playing with GIT.
It is used e.g. in the following TLPs:
TomEE
DeltaSpike
Johnzon
CouchDB
Maven
and many, many more!
It also got discussed on members, infra and even
+1
Ate
On 2016-09-27 14:23, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 14:11, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
Sooo does anyone feel that this needs to wait longer before starting a
vote?..
I'm +1 f
On 2016-09-27 18:12, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...I think for a lot of (NetBeans) folks lurking in these threads, it will be
useful to know what voting means, who can vote, what 'binding votes' are,
etc etc...
Ok we can add that info
documented in the incubator guidelines yet.
Ate
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 26 September 2016, 22:09, Ate Douma wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote:
Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days of
playing with GIT.
It is used e.g. in the
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
