also want to join apache as member.
Thanks in anticipation
Regards,
Ashish Srivastava
www.daffodildb.com
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 1:30 PM
To: Ashish Srivastava
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Making Daffodil
gt; , Zaurus
<http://www.killefiz.de/zaurus/> Software Index etc.
You can download the current version of Daffodil Replicator from
http://www.daffodildb.com:8080/eval/filldetails.jsp
Regards,
Ashish Srivastava
www.daffodildb.com <http://www.daffodildb.com/>
-Original Mes
We have decided to make Daffodil Replicator an open source with Apache.
We have a team of 75 professionals who developed Daffodil DB and
Daffodil Replicator. And will continue working with same after making it
open source.
Any suggestion or comment?
Project Description:
Daffodil Replicator is
ould send across, so that we could use it as a template
for our proposal?
Eagerly awaiting your reply.
Regards,
Ashish Srivastava
www.daffodildb.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian McCallister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Derby source code.
4. Regarding our paradigm and business-model, we can (at this point of time) say that
the objective for going the 'open source' way is singular: To build a robust product
and a robust brand, at the same time leveraging the advantages of Open Source.
Regards,
Ashish Srivasta
Dear Simon,
I must thank you for you mail each time that you send one, simply because it
clears so much in terms of our understanding. Please find my answers /
thoughts below.
> Then that is *much* more likely to be of interest to the ASF. Thanks for
> clarifying that.
Thanks for the positive re
Dear members,
Please find attached our thoughts.
>I find this rather confusing. One of the criteria for exiting
> incubation is a *diverse* set of committers - i.e. an appropriate
> proportion of Daffodil "for-pay" developers but also non-Daffodil
> folks. If your idea of the original number of c
