Hi KimmKing,
We had the project name discussion in the discussion thread[1].
Currently the project doesn't have plans to rename the project name.[2]
[1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/42tvz3rqfy4w5poqgslh71sm1o1td7zn
[2]https://lists.apache.org/thread/68n5kz5c3bm3fm5nckj1zwl3xf2vwcvh
Willem Jian
Hi,
I have a quick question about the initial committers.
There are about 40+ initial committers, but I can only find about 20
contributors in the GitHub group[1] contributor list.
Could you explain the initial committer criteria?
There is a section of "Broader Contributing Members" in the
proposa
Thank you for your question.
With regards to the initial committers, over the years we had much larger
set of contributors who worked on the private repo of ResilientDB which
derives the research. Only when features are stable and well tested over
time, they have been advanced and promoted to our
I just checked the GitHub issue and PRs of ResilientDB. There is
little discussion on the GitHub issue and review comments on GitHub
PRs.
Please keep Open Communications[1] in mind. We value transparency in
the ASF way. Internal development could block the contributions
outside of the organization
Dear Incubator Members, I hope this message finds you well. We've noticed
discussions about the project name and would love to spread our voice
here. We've
used "Answer" since the project's inception, and have attached to it over
the past year. Some of our users are also very familiar with this
nam
Everything we have done including research/papers and outcome of
development have been open for years. We simply wanted to keep the public
repo cleaner and we only released when we were certain that the new feature
is well tested and stable.
We will switch our development completely to our public
