+1 (binding)
- .asc, .sha512 are correct.
- no unexpected binary files in src.
- “incubating” in src name and doc.
- files have license header if needed.
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist.
- didn’t compile b/c OS not supported.
> On May 17, 2021, at 11:18, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and
Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now
closed and it has passed.
Binding votes:
1: +1 votes
- Ming Wen
- Kevin Ratnasekera
- Justin Mclean
0 : 0 votes
0: -1 votes
Hi,
There are two important things I want to mention:
1) 72 hours have not been completed for this vote. So, let's wait for it.
2) Carrying over binding votes from dev list to general is something people
have been talking about for a while now. Let's carry it into another mail
thread in general.
I have a few comments on this release process.
1. If an IPMC member has voted +1 on a release, that vote is valid regardless
of which list the vote was held on. It's the bits that are important. [1]
2. For clarity, when a successful vote is held on the podling's dev list, the
vote thread on the
Thanks Duo Zhang and John for your votes. We still need one more
before we can release.
> If it's the second case, then I agree we should fix it.
I think it's rather the first option. As you described, we distribute
two different repositories and when extracted the LICENSE files are
found insid
Hi all:
Thanks for voting, we still need more votes, thank you.
kezhenxu94@apache 于2021年5月23日周日 下午8:30写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> - .asc, .sha512 are correct.
> - no unexpected binary files in src.
> - “incubating” in src name and doc.
> - files have license header if needed.
> - LICENSE and NOTICE
Hi, my +1 binding, except for file'license issue mentioned by other IPMCs.
here is my checking list.
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP files are fine.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
--
Hi folks,
1. The reason why the BSD license has "2020 - 2021 Apache Sedona" is that
we took the original index.js from that BSD project and modified it to
support our system. If this is not the correct way to show the authorship,
could you please let me know what the best practice is? Then we will
