Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

2018-03-01 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 * the distributions looks good (checked md5, sha, asc) * test the binary distribution: standalone, run examples * src distribution looks good: compile, unit tests, run standalone and examples. Verified at MacOS 10.13.1 - Sijie On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Jai Asher wrote: > Kindly ign

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

2018-03-01 Thread savita3020 ashture
+1 non-binding. Here are the checks which I did: 1. Built release from source on Linux and Windows. 2. Ran sample java chassis demos using sc release to test the basic communication. Regards. Savita On Thu, Mar 1, 2018, 8:20 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 binding. > > Here are the checks those I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

2018-03-01 Thread Mahesh Raju Somalaraju
+1 non-binding Checks done; 1. Built release from source on Linux. 2. Test basic functionalities of front end release in chrome. Thanks & Regards -Mahesh Raju On 2018/03/01 10:44:17, savita3020 ashture wrote: > +1 non-binding.> > > > Here are the checks which I did:> > 1. Built release from sou

incubator/tamaya/0.3-incubating/ ; BAD SIGS

2018-03-01 Thread Henk P. Penning
Hi PPMC amaya, Please take a quick look at : https://checker.apache.org/keys/f779303686e5c596.html As you can see, incubator/amaya/ has 4 bad signature files ; Signing key f779303686e5c596 is both revoked and expired. Please replace the bad signatures soon. Thank ; regards, H

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SensSoft (Incubating) UserALE.js 1.0.0 RC#1

2018-03-01 Thread lewis john mcgibbney
PING folks, We need one more VOTE to ove forward with SensSoft's first Incubating release. Thank you in advance for any reviewers and VOTE'ers. Lewis On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:05 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > Hi Folks, > This thread is an official general@ VOTE to release the Apache SensSoft

Re: incubator/tamaya/0.3-incubating/ ; BAD SIGS

2018-03-01 Thread Oliver B. Fischer
Hi Henk, it is my key. I will update it asap. Oliver Am 01.03.18 um 16:23 schrieb Henk P. Penning: Hi PPMC amaya,   Please take a quick look at :     https://checker.apache.org/keys/f779303686e5c596.html   As you can see, incubator/amaya/ has 4 bad signature files ;   Signing key f77930368

Apache Traffic Control graduation community vote

2018-03-01 Thread Dave Neuman
Hello IPMC, As mentioned in the Guide to Successful Graduation [1] it is recommended that we notifiy the Incubator when a graduation vote is initiated within our project. This email is to let you know that Traffic Control has decided to call a vote for graduation [2]. If this vote is successful w

Incubator PMC Board Report March 2018 - Initial Reminder - General List

2018-03-01 Thread John D. Ament
All, Below is the current reporting schedule for the Incubator wide report board report. Podlings required to report have been notified separately. March 2018 Incubator report timeline: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2018 Wed March 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day Su

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

2018-03-01 Thread Craig Russell
I apologize for coming late to this discussion, but longstanding policy is to accept either SGA or CCLA that identifies the contribution to the satisfaction of the contributor. We don't try to second-guess the intent of the grantor. We assume that their own counsel have reviewed the grant. Some

Fwd: Two issues with license and notice auditing

2018-03-01 Thread Carlos Santana
Forwarding to Incubator mailing list to see if they any guidance. -- Forwarded message - From: Ying Chun Guo Date: Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 PM Subject: Two issues with license and notice auditing To: Hi, team When we are using Apache Creadur to audit licensing and notice file

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

2018-03-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Craig, On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > I apologize for coming late to this discussion, but longstanding policy > is to accept either SGA or CCLA that identifies the contribution to the > satisfaction of the contributor So IIUC this means you agree with the way this