Hi Folks,
I would like to open a DISCUSS thread on the topic of accepting the Science
Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) <
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SDAPProposal> Project into the Incubator.
I am CC'ing Thomas Huang from NASA JPL who I have been working with to
build community around a kick-ass
Thanks for checking, I've added replies inline:
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:09 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> - you may want review your rat excludes and figure out if you are excluding
> too much (several paths couldn't be found in the source release OR do in
> fact have ASF headers, possibly incorrect
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:04 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> I also checked the binary and while the LICENSE looks good the NOTICE is
> missing information from other ALv2 bundled items. [1][2] Please fix for
> the next release.
>
Hi Justin,
I think I have misunderstood your comment on the previous Pu
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Thanks for checking, I've added replies inline:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:09 PM John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> - you may want review your rat excludes and figure out if you are excluding
>> too much (several pat
Hi,
> I think I have misunderstood your comment on the previous Pulsar release :
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c79ae36fdc1f734337a4f706117be87f4c4c568f87605c59ff4c3a96@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Which was referring to the source NOTICE file, we talking about the convince
binary
Hi,
> Is that a good approach? Should that be done for ALv2 dependencies only or
> for all dependencies?
Dependancies don’t matter only what is bundled matters. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled
--
All,
Below is the revised draft. Not much has changed. For mentors receiving
this, we have 5 podlings needing sign off. If you are not sure about
signing off please let the podling know. Otherwise please try to sign off
at your convenience.
Incubator PMC report for October 2017
The Apache In
(trimming CC since asking a specific question)
John -- how would you like to handle Gossip's lack of report? It seems
like despite my pestering, no one on the ppmc is creating one.
I can try to put one together on their behalf, but I don't want to give
an impression that they're doing more th
Josh,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:48 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> (trimming CC since asking a specific question)
>
> John -- how would you like to handle Gossip's lack of report? It seems
> like despite my pestering, no one on the ppmc is creating one.
>
My personal take - mentor should be adding their
Thanks, John. That helps and I agree with your assessment.
Let me leave comment to that effect.
On 10/11/17 10:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
Josh,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:48 PM Josh Elser wrote:
(trimming CC since asking a specific question)
John -- how would you like to handle Gossip's la
10 matches
Mail list logo
