On 03/08/17 05:13, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:13 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
Hi all,
In regards to the recently incubated project - Gobblin, we were wondering
a
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 03/08/17 05:13, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:13 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:50 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> We have the git history from the project of origin; the entire Ray
> project (Apache 2.0) git history is commingled with the Plasma Object
> Store code, so it would be possible with some effort to extract only
> the commits relating to the cont
John D. Ament wrote on 8/2/17 9:13 PM:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In regards to the recently incubated project - Gobblin, we were wondering
>>> about the policy around renaming Java pa
Hi IPMC members...
Just Wondering if you saw the voting email of Apache SPOT 1.0 (Incubating)
Release on this thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32d7c93fe66cc256ed12a5b8f91b57b1d0d659b9012c8f4f13c11191@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Any comments or feedback regarding the release w
From the peanut gallery:
Does the PPMC get to decide what constitutes a "very good reason" or does
the IPMC and after graduation, the board?
Flex has not changed its packages in the 5 years at Apache. We felt
backward compatibility was and is a "very good reason". It was way more
important to n
It rarely comes down to the IPMC or the Board dictating how a project names its
java classes (does anyone recall an instance?), so it’s mainly the project’s
discretion. In my opinion, where the project is on its adoption curve is an
important consideration.
Most projects that enter the incubato
Alex Harui wrote on 8/3/17 10:37 AM:
> From the peanut gallery:
>
> Does the PPMC get to decide what constitutes a "very good reason" or does
> the IPMC and after graduation, the board?
>
> Flex has not changed its packages in the 5 years at Apache. We felt
> backward compatibility was and is a
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:42 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> John D. Ament wrote on 8/2/17 9:13 PM:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> In regards to the recently incubated project -
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +general@incubator
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:22 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Legal-discuss@ to Bcc
>>
>> Thanks, John. The code will be part of Apache MXNet and our
+general@incubator
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:22 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Legal-discuss@ to Bcc
>
> Thanks, John. The code will be part of Apache MXNet and our team will
> commit to maintaining this. I will reach out to Apple, but I am not
> optimistic they wil
On 03/08/17 15:51, Julian Hyde wrote:
It rarely comes down to the IPMC or the Board dictating how a project names its
java classes (does anyone recall an instance?), so it’s mainly the project’s
discretion. In my opinion, where the project is on its adoption curve is an
important considerati
OK, so to summarize a more refined recommendation:
1) package names with reverse domains MUST be renamed before graduation or
have an IPMC approved plan for renaming
2) Projects who expect that their future users outnumber current users are
highly encouraged to rename packages
3) Other projects ar
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 12:25, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> OK, so to summarize a more refined recommendation:
>
> 1) package names with reverse domains MUST be renamed before graduation or
> have an IPMC approved plan for renaming
NetBeans uses org.netbeans, and the domain is also being donated to
One caveat - if your packages are "com.theoldcompany.someproject" they
should be renamed to "org.apache.someproject" before graduation. If you
have "org.someproject" already or just "someproject" as your package names,
that's not a naming issue so I don't see that ever blocking graduation.
John
Does this actually need to be policy? What’s the harm to the foundation if a
project continues to use a non-Apache package name, assuming that the code was
donated appropriately?
Certainly, it should be a goal for all projects to use o.a.* package names, but
if you look around the Foundation
Thanks all for your replies. We decided to bite the bullet and do it since
we are half way already through our work. We will try to address backward
incompatibilities via package shims, and special handling of configs.
On a side note, I think for matters such as these Incubator should document
the
Which must's do you see greg?
On Aug 3, 2017 1:09 PM, "Greg Trasuk" wrote:
> Does this actually need to be policy? What’s the harm to the foundation
> if a project continues to use a non-Apache package name, assuming that the
> code was donated appropriately?
>
> Certainly, it should be a goal
When Storm was incubating, our package names started with backtype.* and
storm.* and it stayed that way through graduation and there was never any
mention of a need to change. In fact, Storm only moved to org.apache.* with the
1.0 release in April 2016, about 1.5 years after graduation.
There a
This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version
1.19.0-incubating.
Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics,
guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor management
Its very hard to understand this release. How do I build it? How do I run
RAT?
John
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:50 AM Raymundo Panduro
wrote:
> Dear IPMC team,
>
> This is the vote for *Apache SPOT 1.0 (incubating) release*. This is
> the first release of SPOT.
>
>
> The PPMC Vote Threads can
21 matches
Mail list logo
