Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating (RC1)

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 07/24/2017 07:32 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator rel

Edit access to wiki for proposal

I would like to request edit access to the incubator wiki so that I can create a new proposal. My wiki username is: SteveLawrence Thanks, - Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: Edit access to wiki for proposal

Done, happy editing! On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:59 AM Steve Lawrence wrote: > I would like to request edit access to the incubator wiki so that I can > create a new proposal. > > My wiki username is: SteveLawrence > > Thanks, > - Steve > > -

[DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

Dear Apache Incubator Community, We would like to start a discussion around a proposal to bring Daffodil into the Apache Incubator. Daffodil is a implementation of the DFDL specification used to convert between fixed format data and XML/JSON. The draft proposal can be found in the wiki at the fol

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

What is the relationship between Daffodil and something like Apache Tika's extraction engine? On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Steve Lawrence < stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > We would like to start a discussion around a proposal to bring Daffodil > int

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

I'll preface this saying that I don't have a ton of experience with Apache Tika. But based on my understanding, Tika and Daffodil do have somewhat similar goals, but reach them in different ways. For example, Tika requires that one writes /code/ to perform data extraction, usually relying on existi

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

Hi, This looks like a very interesting proposal. It's a bit worrisome though that you have no champion or mentor. Have you been in contact with anyone at the ASF on this? I see that the existing code appears to have 3 different copyright holders, and all code is derived from the BSD-3-clause li

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

I've emailed two Apache NiFi committers, but I did not realize that they were not ASF members, so couldn't be a champion. One of them reached out to an IPMC member who said that it was fine to write a proposal and send it to the gen@incubator without having a champion, and this could be a good way

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

Yes, DFDL and its open source implementation Daffodil are more about file formats and getting access to the entirety of a file's contents in a consistent way through machine readable specifications. The work has implications in the area of digital preservation allowing one to preserve these mac

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

Hi Kenton, Is there any reason that you and others from the NCSA are not Initial Committers? That would make this proposal stronger. Regarding Apache Tika - it relies on other projects including Apache POI and Apache PDFBox. They are pragmatic about what is used. If Daffodil works to expand th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3-incubating

Dear all, our vote is now running for more then a week. Should I close the vote and start it again? I am not sure what is missing to get enough positive (or even negative) votes on our release. Oliver Am 16.07.17 um 23:38 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: Dear all, The Apache Tamaya team would li

INFRA guide to graduation?

Is there any documentation detailing how to file a proper and complete JIRA for graduation? For example, which components should be put in the JIRA, issue type, etc. It seems to me that good docs in this regard could save INFRA a lot of headaches, and could help projects understand which infrastru

Re: INFRA guide to graduation?

Christopher, Please review [ 1] If something seems off - we just did a review [2], please feel free to comment. Or have infra knock on our door. John [1]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3-incubating

Oliver, No, please leave the current vote open. People will vote, just give them some time (summer holidays has everyone a bit sluggish to respond). You have 5 +1's on the dev list, 1 of which is binding, so you'll be fine :-) John On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:36 PM Oliver B. Fischer wrote: > D

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3-incubating

+1 binding 1. Verified Sigs and Hashes 2. Verified the DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE 3. Ran a clean {src} build and all tests pass. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:21 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Oliver, > > No, please leave the current vote open. People will vote, just give them > some time (summe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3-incubating

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name includes incubating - signatures and md5 hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - no unexpected binary files - all source file have headers - can compile from source Thanks, Justin ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating (RC1)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - server and client's LICENSE and NOTICE good (although Autoconf had me concerned for a second there) - no unexpected binary files - all source files have ASF headers I didn't compile from source