Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC3

2017-05-06 Thread John D. Ament
Craig, To comment on a few of these notes. Many of these are valid issues with the release, but generally would not block an initial release. I would recommend we follow our rule of "point it out, pass it as it doesn't create a legal issue, and expect it to be fixed for next release." The only

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)

2017-05-06 Thread John D. Ament
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:48 PM Arvind Surve wrote: > Thanks John for response. > Let me try to answer your third question. > > > > > In the samples/images directory you have a bunch of files named "bluemix" > > which implies IBM Bluemix. How are these images licensed? > > Arvind: These are scre

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)

2017-05-06 Thread John D. Ament
+1 to release there are some issues with the release that can be fixed in the next release. On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:42 PM Arvind Surve wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.14.0-incubating ! > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-05-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
To be clear, yes, I would. > On May 5, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Anyone else interested in mentoring? > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 1, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> I had a discussion with Joe and another gentleman

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC3

2017-05-06 Thread Craig Russell
Hi John, > On May 6, 2017, at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Craig, > > To comment on a few of these notes. > > Many of these are valid issues with the release, but generally would not > block an initial release. I would recommend we follow our rule of "point > it out, pass it as it doesn'

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache SystemML podling graduation

2017-05-06 Thread John D. Ament
Luciano, I suspect from a community standpoint SystemML is ready to go. I'm concerned about their ability to create ASF compliant releases. Their current release under vote is problematic, specifically the contents of the LICENSE file. I would like to see the podling leave the incubator with a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache SystemML podling graduation

2017-05-06 Thread Luciano Resende
John, Although the latest release had one small license issue due to recent changes, I don't consider that a blocking for graduation, particularly when we look at the past couple releases that passed without any issues trough IPMC. SystemML 0.12 release candidate vote at General https://www.mail-

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache SystemML podling graduation

2017-05-06 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. Sounds like it's passed time to discuss graduation. There's no such thing as a perfect release, and the measure of a community is not its ability to make a perfect release, but its ability to deal with, and learn from, a release issue. Hen On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:04 Luciano Resende wrote: