Re: Where to edit a podling's data for whimsey?

2017-03-26 Thread Stack
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 03/24/2017 11:18 PM, Stack wrote: > > I am having trouble finding where to edit to fix a podling's whimsey > view? > > Pointers appreciated. > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > > > TL;DR: https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/ ;) > > Thanks Daniel.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

2017-03-26 Thread John D. Ament
Nope, its perfectly fine. I was curious more-so if it was an existing company, and if it was a problem with naming. John On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:41 AM Jignesh Patel wrote: > Hi John and Marc, > > Regarding the Quickstep Technologies reference, it was the legal entity > (LLC registered in Wis

Re: Slack

2017-03-26 Thread Evan Hughes
On a slack channel for a uni club, might just be worth emailing them to increase the limit on a per project basis as we have around 900 free users. Also the cost of slack is extremely high. Even though communication is important for a community, the cost is per user. On 26 Mar 2017 4:18 PM, "Yani

Re: Slack

2017-03-26 Thread Wade Chandler
My understanding is there isn’t a max limit on Slack for users for free, and I have confirmed this with Slack there is not supposed to be a limitation on numbers of members. NetBeans for instance has 320 members. Did someone tell you this or did you run into some issue? If so, you might write th

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

2017-03-26 Thread Josh Elser
+1 from my limited interactions. I've had a few run-ins with the Metron crowd (winks) over the last year or so via IPMC votes. They've always been nice to work with and have shown positive responses from any release-time issues (e.g. licensing/branding). Casey Stella wrote: Hi Everyone, Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

2017-03-26 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 from the peanut gallery.;-) Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 from my limited interactions. > > I've had a few ru

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

2017-03-26 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:03 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:52 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >> To be honest, I don't know, but I don't see it as a problem. >> >> I will admit upfront that I am a Hortonworks employee, so there is >> potential for b

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

2017-03-26 Thread Josh Elser
+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK * Could build src and pip tarballs * L&N look OK with caveats * DISCLAIMER present While I appreciate the obvious effort that went into the assembly of your LICENSE file, there are some issues: * The Copyright clauses are disjoint from the bundled software. How do

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

2017-03-26 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
There are other folks from companies like Cisco who are also interested in the project. In fact Metron grew out of OpenSOC efforts from Cisco. debo On 3/26/17, 11:59 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:03 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

2017-03-26 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Katherine Marsden wrote: > On 2/21/17 12:13 PM, Chip Senkbeil wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree >> (incubating) version 0.1.0. >> > > I have a question about checksums and really about the validation script > in the relea

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

2017-03-26 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * xsums/sigs OK > * Could build src and pip tarballs > * L&N look OK with caveats > * DISCLAIMER present > > While I appreciate the obvious effort that went into the assembly of your > LICENSE file, there are some issues: > > *

Re: Slack

2017-03-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Wade, You are right: invite people on Slack means adding them as member. However, how can we accept Slack participants without inviting them ? Is it possible ? Thanks ! Regards JB On 03/26/2017 07:05 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: My understanding is there isn’t a max limit on Slack for users

Re: Slack

2017-03-26 Thread Yaniv Rodenski
Hi JB, A common practice/hack is to create a small web app that allows people to send themselves invitations using the Slack API. For example: http://www.skill-space.com/blog/2015/11/16/create-an-auto-invite-channel-using-slack-heroku1 Cheers, Yaniv On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 at 3:40 pm, Jean-Baptiste

Re: Slack

2017-03-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Yes, but they will be member anyway, so it won't change the limit we have today (90), right ? Regards JB On 03/27/2017 06:56 AM, Yaniv Rodenski wrote: Hi JB, A common practice/hack is to create a small web app that allows people to send themselves invitations using the Slack API. For example: