Podling request steps have been updated

All, I just got done editing the podling request page on the public website. Its based on areas that have changed recently. http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-podling If everyone could take a look and give feedback and where there needs to be more detail, I would appreciate it.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC3)

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 12/22/2016 01:38 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator rel

[DISCUSS ] Graduate Apache Ranger project to TLP

Dear Incubator members, Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version and with this there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger community to consider graduation to TLP. Apache Ranger entered into incubation on 24th July 2014 and from there on this welcomin

Re: Podling request steps have been updated

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:45 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I just got done editing the podling request page on the public website. > Its based on areas that have changed recently. > > http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-podling > > If everyone could take a look and give feedba

[RESULT][VOTE] Ratis to enter Apache Incubator

The vote passes with 11 +1 votes and no -1. Binding votes (9) Jakob Homan, Andrew Purtell, Uma Maheswara Rao G, Chris Nauroth, Roman Shaposhnik, Suneel Marthi, Chris Douglas, Enis Soztutar, Jitendra Pandey Non Binding votes (2) Anu Engineer, Arpit Agarwal Thanks everyone for voting and the

Re: Podling request steps have been updated

Roman, On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:30 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:45 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > All, > > > > I just got done editing the podling request page on the public website. > > Its based on areas that have changed recently. > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the 2013 Alternate Voting Policy

I'd rather not sanctify exceptions with a precise list, but rather stop at: "During incubation, a podling's release package may not be perfect. It will be up to mentors and IPMC members to define the appropriate leeway". Or something to that extent. Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 6:03 P

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the 2013 Alternate Voting Policy

On 27 December 2016 at 20:44, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > I'd rather not sanctify exceptions with a precise list, but rather stop at: > > "During incubation, a podling's release package may not be perfect. It ... package may not be fully in compliance with [ASF release policy](https://www.apache.o

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here: http://mail-archives.apache

Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Hello, The last release of Apache FreeMarker (incubating) has these Maven coordinates: org.freemarker freemarker 2.3.25-incubating The "-incubating" in the Maven version is confusing for the users, as it looks as the version number of an unstable release, and it seems that this cause

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-139) Test ticket for Apache Incubator Logo Contest submissions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15781763#comment-15781763 ] Roman Shaposhnik commented on INCUBATOR-139: [~johndament] & [~bdelacretaz]

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

I think it could also be confusing for users of the Maven version didn't match the IPMC released version identifier. If anything, it probably makes more sense to have the '-incubating' in the groupId , since it's the endorsement of the foundation which is in the interim state. The groupId typicall

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

I personally have received negative feedback from both colleagues and management on the use of projects with the name "incubating" in them, putting them into the same category as alpha or beta software. When Daniel brought this up on the freemarker list, I did give him my support in the matter. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

-1 to allow you to fix the critical issue now, and will review the release more shortly. Projects must not link to unreleased software. See also: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#unreleased Please remove the download links to the unapproved 1.8.0 release. John On Tue, Dec 27

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

Hi John, Are you referring to the link on http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/downloads/index.html or something else? Rgds, JvD > On Dec 27, 2016, at 7:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > -1 to allow you to fix the critical issue now, and wi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

A few questions about the release contents: - Have you contacted legal-discuss RE CC-SA 4.0 IPL? Per [1] it is not 2.5 or 3.0 so it requires legal input. Can you also point out which files are covered under this? Listing "data" and "component" doesn't help me identify. - There are no instruction

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:58 PM Jan van Doorn wrote: > Hi John, > > Are you referring to the link on > http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/downloads/index.html < > http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/downloads/index.html> or something else? > That's the one I saw. If you know of others, would be goo

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:43 PM John D. Ament wrote: > I personally have received negative feedback from both colleagues and > management on the use of projects with the name "incubating" in them, > putting them into the same category as alpha or beta software. > > When Daniel brought this up on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

I removed the link. We’ll review the other issues you mention tomorrow. Thanks for your help! Rgds, JvD > On Dec 27, 2016, at 8:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:58 PM Jan van Doorn wrote: > >> Hi John, >> >> Are you referring to the link on >> http://trafficcontro