Re: [FINAL DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2016

2016-12-17 Thread John D. Ament
Ted, I'll leave it to you to submit when you're done. John On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > I need to do some sign-offs. > > Otherwise looks good. > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > All, > > > > Please find the final draft below. Unless t

Re: Seeking Additional Mentors - Hammock Podling

2016-12-17 Thread John D. Ament
Upayavira, Updated! Thanks for taking a look. John On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM Upayavira wrote: > John, > > Can you update the proposal to include a definition of CDI for those of > us that don't know what it means? > > Thanks! > > Upayavira > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, at 03:03 AM, John D. A

Re: Seeking Additional Mentors - Hammock Podling

2016-12-17 Thread James Carman
I'll need to take a look to see how much this overlaps with what Microbule has to offer. Sounds interesting, though. Might make sense to combine efforts? On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:01 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Upayavira, > > > > Updated! Thanks for taking a look. > > > > John > > > > On Fri,

Re: Seeking Additional Mentors - Hammock Podling

2016-12-17 Thread John D. Ament
James Would be happy to discuss that. Would also be happy to consider a consolidated effort if it makes sense. On Dec 17, 2016 15:02, "James Carman" wrote: > I'll need to take a look to see how much this overlaps with what Microbule > has to offer. Sounds interesting, though. Might make sens

Re: [FINAL DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2016

2016-12-17 Thread Ted Dunning
Thanks. Done. Will send it shortly. On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:46 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Ted, I'll leave it to you to submit when you're done. > > John > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I need to do some sign-offs. > > > > Otherwise looks good. > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Ratis to enter Apache Incubator

2016-12-17 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 (binding) -C On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > Dear All, >I would like to call a vote for accepting "Ratis" for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. > The full proposal is available below, and is also available at this wiki link. >https://wiki.apache.org/incub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER and NOTICE file. Also some files (for instance [1][2]]) contain the text of the GPL license. GPL is Category X and is not allowed as a dependancy (unless it’s an optional component or build tools like autoconf in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-17 Thread Mike Jumper
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER > and NOTICE file. > > Fair enough. Looks like we need to update EXTRA_DIST in the top-level Makefile.am. Also some files (for instance [1][2]]) contain the te

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Yes ... assuming we can legally strip out the GPL option of that license > without violating said license. I'm wary of modifying/removing license > terms of third-party software. INAL but IMO yes it’s ok. This has come up on both legal discuss and this list before. But if you’re concerned

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-17 Thread Mike Jumper
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > ... > >> Is the issue with DISCLAIMER and NOTICE the only issue you've found which >> blocks this release? > > Yep they would be the only things I consider blockers. > OK. Sounds good then. Thanks for taking the time to review, Justin. I'l

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-17 Thread Mike Jumper
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER and > NOTICE file. > Due to the issue noted above, this VOTE is canceled. We'll work to address this in the next RC. Thanks, - Mike