+1 (binding)
Three things will be improved for new release (I will create the
corresponding Jira):
- binary file used in test (it should be generated with the test)
- change headers in some files
- check with the team about the origin of some code (and eventually
update the NOTICE)
Regards
J
Hi Roman,
Thank for the comments.
2016-08-23 2:20 GMT+09:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
> Two of the areas that I'd like to explicitly solicit IPMC's opinion
> on are:
> 1. whether the process of re-licensing from LGPL to ALv2
> was enough given the ASF's strict IP policies
The initial release w
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
> 2016-08-23 2:20 GMT+09:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
>> Two of the areas that I'd like to explicitly solicit IPMC's opinion
>> on are:
>>
>> 1. whether the process of re-licensing from LGPL to ALv2
>> was enough given the ASF's strict IP polic
Hi,
> - check with the team about the origin of some code (and eventually update
> the NOTICE)
There’s probably no need to add anything to NOTICE as openCSV doesn’t have a
NOTICE file. [1][2]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
2. https://sourceforge.net/
Agreed for OpenCSV, but I would like to check if there's no other code
coming from other projects.
Regards
JB
On 08/23/2016 02:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
- check with the team about the origin of some code (and eventually update the
NOTICE)
There’s probably no need to add anything to
Hi Marvin,
I'm going to answer your two questions.
> 1) Who were the copyright holders at the time of relicensing?
At the time of re-licensing, the copyright holder was AIST,
my employer at that time.
> 2) How was their permission secured?
Hivemall was at that time my solo research project at
With 3 +1 binding votes, and NO -1 and/or
+-0 votes I believe this VOTE passes. Thanks to everyone who voted.
Here's the tally:
+1 binding:
Jakob Homan
Suneel Marthi
John D. Ament
Thanks,
Arthur
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:19 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> +1 look forward to seeing something like
All,
I'm wondering if the Apache Incubator is full right now? I've noticed a
few things:
- There was a note a few months ago that the incubator does have a max
capacity. At that point, things start to slow down.
- The discussions involved when a new project comes in have dwindled.
- The number
Hi John,
Fair question. I think we accepted lot of projects in the incubator
recently.
IMHO, the first action to do is to check with the current podlings the
ones ready to graduate. I think we have at least 2 or 3 podlings ready.
On the other hand, we can also double check the global podlin
The Apache Geode team is proud to announce Apache Geode release
1.0.0-incubating.M3.
Apache Geode (incubating) is a data management platform that provides
a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and
a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency performance
w
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Hi Marvin,
>
> I'm going to answer your two questions.
>
>> 1) Who were the copyright holders at the time of relicensing?
>
> At the time of re-licensing, the copyright holder was AIST,
> my employer at that time.
Looking at the Github history,
Hi Marvin,
2016-08-24 1:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey :
> Looking at the Github history, though, it seems that there were pull requests
> and issues file by others prior to the Mar 16, 2015 relicensing. Were there
> any contributions made before then by people not employed by AIST?
>
> If everyone
+1 Especially for point 2, adding to the maturity model.
Finding a release manager can be a problem, but is also an opportunity: a
committer who wants to become more involved with project governance can
volunteer to be RM. A well-functioning project makes this process as smooth as
possible.
Ju
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Hi Marvin,
>
> 2016-08-24 1:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey :
>> Looking at the Github history, though, it seems that there were pull requests
>> and issues file by others prior to the Mar 16, 2015 relicensing. Were there
>> any contributions made
I wonder if the requirement might be better phrased along the lines of
"must have releases completed by a total of > 2 release managers".
Asking people if their documentation is correct and complete almost always
results in a yes answer and a moral onus on the questioner to either accept
that answ
Hi,
> I think what we have to do is listing Copyrights and Licenses in NOTICE file
> as seen in
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/NOTICE#L86
>
> Is my understanding right?
No, that notice file is IMO a poor example to copy from. MIT and BSD licenses
need to be mentioned in LICENSE n
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
> There are 5 individuals, excluding project committers, sent pull requests
> to the project before moving to ALv2: smly, y-tag, ryukobayashi,
> spiritloose, and takahi-i.
I assume that all the "project committers" (if that group is more than j
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
>
>> There are 5 individuals, excluding project committers, sent pull requests
>> to the project before moving to ALv2: smly, y-tag, ryukobayashi,
>> spiritloose, and takahi-i.
>
> I assu
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I wonder if the requirement might be better phrased along the lines of
> "must have releases completed by a total of > 2 release managers".
I really like this criteria and use it extensively with my podlings.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
