Thanks Marvin,
That was blazingly fast, much appreciated!
Best,
Arthur
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Arthur Wiedmer
> wrote:
>
> > Could I please be added to the Incubator Wiki Contributors Group?
> > My wiki login is ArthurWiedmer.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC
> of the sponsor.
>
> I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the private@ list and to have
> binding votes on podling releases. These both require PMC membership.
>
is this just personal catharsis?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell
> wrote:
>> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC
>> of the sponsor.
>>
>> I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> It simple I like that.
:)
As expressed in another thread, I believe simple rules are really helpful for
newcomers.
> It will also tend to make NOTICE
> files larger and that has a flow on effect to downstream projects.
This is only one s
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell
> wrote:
> > There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the
> PMC
> > of the sponsor.
> >
> > I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the private@ list and to have
>
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 11:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell
>> wrote:
>>> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the
>> PMC
>>> of the sponsor.
>>>
>>> I’d
It's been a week since this thread started and surprisingly there isn't any
reaction so far. Is it safe to assume the silent consensus has been reached?
Cos
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:52PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is my pleasure to present the proposal to incubate the Quickstep proj
I actually have an opinion!
I saw yet another database engine land and my heart sank
Then I did some digging into quickstep and realised it was more of a
"traditional" database that might take on the likes of Exasol etc rather
than plugging more SQL into NOSQL etc(from what I gather) and I am
That's a fair statement. In general, however, it isn't a concern of the
Incubator if a proposed podling have some sort of resemblance with some other
software out there. IINM, no one was rejected because they want to develop yet
another web-application server or something like this.
Cos
On Tue, M
If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. Or rather, reduce the
champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. Once the project has
entered incubation, the champion’s role ends.
While Calcite was in incubation no one (including the champion) had a clue what
the role of t
The page at
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/theapacheway.html
needs to be updated to reflect the new location of the ComDev mailing
lists. It is no longer commun...@apache.org (and
community-subscr...@apache.org), but is instead d...@community.apache.org
(and dev-subscr...@community.apache.org).
No, absolutely my comment wasn't supposed to have any insinuation about
whether the project should get incubated or not from a proposal
perspective. It was just a round about way of saying, I like the proposal,
its fresh, looks sane and is something that's a bit different so it gets a
+1 from me.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Christopher wrote:
The page at
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/theapacheway.html
needs to be updated to reflect the new location of the ComDev mailing
lists. It is no longer commun...@apache.org (and
community-subscr...@apache.org), but is instead d...@community.apache.org
Hello,
The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3. We now kindly request
that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator
release.
Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source
initiat
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion.
> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation.
> Once the project has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends.
+1000 to the above. With all of my ex
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/22/2016 10:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Inc
Hi!
Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.
The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST.
[ ] +1 Accept Quickst
+1 (binding)
--Chris Nauroth
On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
>and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
>Please vote to accept Quickstep into t
+1 binding
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apac
Hi,
+1 binding
Carried over from the dev list. Did all of my usual checks.
Note if you’re compiling on OS X you may need to make a couple of minor mods to
build.sh.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the
+1 binding.
Personally tested release on Arduino Zero and Simulated environments.
Have seen it working on NRF51, NRF52 environments.
Sterling
On 3/22/16 2:50 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
+1 binding
Carried over from the dev list. Did all of my usual checks.
Note if you’re compiling on OS X
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) -C
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
>>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
>> and the fe
Roman Shaposhnik wrote on 3/22/16 4:56 PM:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion.
>> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation.
>> Once the project has entered incubation, the champion’s r
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion.
>> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation.
>> Once the project has entered incubation, t
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:35 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde
> wrote:
> >> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion.
> >> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a
26 matches
Mail list logo
