Hi all,
Just wondering, should we tell podlings that a board report is considered
public while in draft and can be discussed on their dev list, or its
private and should be discussed on their private list?
I had always assumed public, but could hear someone say its private.
John
On Sunday, January 4, 2015, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, should we tell podlings that a board report is considered
> public while in draft and can be discussed on their dev list, or its
> private and should be discussed on their private list?
clearly public, the report is
Board reports are always public, as are a project's/podling's discussions about
what should go in their report.
It's the mentors job to clear up any confusion there may be for a podling
writing its first report.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2015, at 5:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi al
I know many projects (TLP) which discuss/draft the report in private and only
later make it public.
LieGrue,
strub
> On Sunday, 4 January 2015, 16:10, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> > Board reports are always public, as are a project's/podling's
> discussions about what should go in their report.
>
Imnsho, that is a poor practice.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> I know many projects (TLP) which discuss/draft the report in private and only
> later make it public.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>>> On Sunday, 4 January 2015, 16:10, Alan Cabr
There are occasionally items that appear in board reports enclosed in
, which concern behavior of project members, legal issues,
not-yet-publicized security exploits, and the like, which should
probably remain private. This is the exception, rather than the norm.
Everything else should be publi
On 04/01/2015 Mark Struberg wrote:
I know many projects (TLP) which discuss/draft the report in private
and only later make it public.
OpenOffice, both as podling and TLP, has done the opposite (which I
assume is the norm): report is discussed on the dev list, stored on a
wiki page and the pr
Thank you Roman and IPMC members!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> sorry for not sending this out sooner -- holidays got
> the best of me ;-)
>
> I am really happy to welcome an ASF member
> Hyunsik Choi, who has recently voluteered to
> join the Incubator PMC!
On 02.01.2015 11:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Apache Commons has already given write access to *all* ASF committers
So did Subversion, quite a while ago.
If you get rogue commits from someone, the solution is not extra tooling
but community management. Even more so in the case of the Incubato
