Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] HTrace for Apache Incubator

2014-11-04 Thread Steve Loughran
the code inside is all org.htrace; changing that would be painful for both the developers and the current users who owns htrace.org? On 3 November 2014 19:27, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the positive feedback and volunteering. I think the > more mentors the merrier -- all the f

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-04 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:57 AM, David Blevins wrote: > ...Provided it's the community leading the JSR and not the JSR leading the > community, I think we're a go for Incubation It's not right for anyone but the community to lead an Apache project, so I trust the fine mentors of this new proje

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] HTrace for Apache Incubator

2014-11-04 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > the code inside is all org.htrace; changing that would be painful for both > the developers and the current users Sure. But we'd have to migrate to org.apache anyway -- I don't think it matters then. > who owns htrace.org? I believe it bel

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-04 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Anatole, On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Tresch, Anatole wrote: > ...The difference between initial and core developers was that the code > contribution > is completely done from my personal GitHub repo Not sure what you mean - just to clarify, once the project is accepted in the Incubat

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-04 Thread Anatole Tresch
Oh, sorry for the confusion. That will be the case, of course. I will remove the project from Github, when the incubator is accepted ;) And also to say it franckly: I really see Apache as a great chance not as an emergency solution (because the EE config JSR has not been done). I am personally quit

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-04 Thread Mark Struberg
Please count me in as mentor. LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 4 November 2014, 13:39, Anatole Tresch wrote: > > Oh, sorry for the confusion. That will be the case, of course. I will > remove the project from Github, when the incubator is accepted ;) > And also to say it franckly: I really see A

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-04 Thread Anatole Tresch
Hi Mark Perfect! -Anatole 2014-11-04 15:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Please count me in as mentor. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Tuesday, 4 November 2014, 13:39, Anatole Tresch > wrote: > > > Oh, sorry for the confusion. That will be the case, of course. I will > > remove the project

[VOTE] Release of Apache Ranger 0.4.0 (incubating) [Formally known as Apache Argus]

2014-11-04 Thread Selvamohan Neethiraj
The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.4.0 (incubating). This will be our first release since the project entered incubation in July 2014 as Apache Argus and then, got it renamed as Apache Ranger. The ranger-0.4.0-rc1 release candidate is ava

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release of Apache Ranger 0.4.0 (incubating) [Formally known as Apache Argus]

2014-11-04 Thread Selvamohan Neethiraj
Hi, A request was made to Apache Ranger dev community to add more details on LICENSES to LICENSE.txt. I therefore cancel the vote here to avoid any additional work from IPMC. Expect another vote thread in a short period. Thanks, Selva- On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Selvamohan Neethiraj wrote