Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

Hey guys, Sorry I didn't see Henry and Justin's comments until just now. Per Justin's primary concerns about the License stuff: I think we've just made mistakes in the notice and license files as to exactly how we reference things. All the category B licenses are mvn binary dependencies (per the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

One additional thought. As I'm thinking more about the NOTICE and LICENSE files I think it would be really helpful to have some reviews from you guys much earlier in the process than the next release vote. While the docs are helpful and we'll do our best, I'm skeptical we'll get it exactly right

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know what dependencies will come in when I compile the code. Marking the dependencies as source inclusions or as compile time or as test dependencies or as pack

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

Hi Ted, On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be > documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know > what dependencies will come in when I compile the code. Marking the > dependencies as so

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Falcon version 0.5-incubating

Hi folks, I'm canceling the vote for Falcon 0.5-incubating, candidate 3 as there were issues with license. Will have a new RC soon. -- Regards, Venkatesh “Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away.” - Antoine de

Re: [PROPOSAL] REEF for the Apache Incubator

Looks like the feedback has been well received. Any reason not to start a vote? Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Hi Jake, > > Thank you for the comment. > > We had discussions on how to structure mailing lists with our mentors. > We took our mentors' sugge

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

Hi, > Justin, would you be willing to review these changes > once we get them up so that we can make sure we're not making other foolish > mistakes? Sure just ping me and I'll take a look - it's reasonably straight forward if you follow this [1] Justin 1.http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-how

Re: [PROPOSAL] REEF for the Apache Incubator

Hi Roman, I will send an email to start a vote soon. Thanks! -Gon On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Looks like the feedback has been well received. > > Any reason not to start a vote? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > >

[VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

Hi, Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is attached below, and it is also available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReefProposal Let's keep this vot

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

[x] +1 Accept REEF into the Incubator On 8 August 2014 22:40, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion > has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is attache

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion > has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is attached below, and it is also availab