On 25 March 2014 06:14, David Crossley wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 01:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> > sebb:
>> >
>> >> Not always, for example
>> >>
>> >> OpenOffice.org => ooo
>> >>
>> >> The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is t
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix
is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed
as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This
is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix
is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed
as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This
is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the
+1. Downloaded the source, built the package and ran unit tests.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:39 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix
> is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed
> as a JDBC
Can you update your notice file? [1]
- John
[1]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=blob;f=NOTICE;h=08364793ad096649eb24b3d582b2307376b25863;hb=HEAD
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> +1. Downloaded the source, built the package and ran unit t
On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament wrote:
> Can you update your notice file? [1]
Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file.
See
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple (et seq.)
> - John
>
> [1]:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.
On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix
> is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed
> as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL.
> This
>
What do you mean? That was Phoenix's file I was linking to.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Can you update your notice file? [1]
>
> Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file.
>
> See
>
> http://www.apache.org/de
See http://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/scaling_down_the_cms_to
for today's discussion of the Thrift migration to the CMS.
Basically there was a support gap for moderately-sized sites
that has now been filled with the latest changes to the cms
build libs.
HTH
On 25 March 2014 18:56, John D. Ament wrote:
> What do you mean? That was Phoenix's file I was linking to.
I realise that the file is in the Phoenix Git and is called NOTICE.
However it is not a valid NOTICE file according to:
[0] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple (et seq.)
+1 (binding) carrying my vote on dev@phoenix.incubator over to general@,
caveat the HBase 0.98.1 release happens as expected before this vote
closes. Otherwise we should cancel this vote.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Ph
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor wrote:
> [...]
>
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-3.0.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The source bundle
On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix
Pardon, got -bin and -src crossed mentally, indeed they are there.
Looks like src was packaged after running the RAT check. Does this require
a new RC?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb wro
Just clarifying that Phoenix is trying to do two releases (3.0.0 and
4.0.0) at the same time?
Or maybe my gmail thread history is messed up.
- Henry
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix
> i
On 25 March 2014 22:01, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Pardon, got -bin and -src crossed mentally, indeed they are there.
>
> Looks like src was packaged after running the RAT check. Does this require
> a new RC?
If I were the RM I would respin the RC for this sort of packaging error.
But in this case
The 4.0.0 release has the same problems as the 3.0.0 release.
Spurious files in source bundle
Incorrect NOTICE file in binary bundle
Source bundle does not agree with Git tag even after allowing for the
spurious RAT files - some other files have differences from the tag.
There are also some files
James, Mujtaba, et. al.,
Can we add a "Releasing" page to http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/ that
includes step by step instructions for packaging a Phoenix release. We can
fine tune this process according to feedback received during RCs. This
could/should include shell commands captured one tim
Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending
your time going through this. Here's the list of TODOs for us:
1) In the binary bundle:
a) Fix the copy/paste error for the URL to SQLLine in the NOTICE file
in the binary bundle as noted by Gabriel here[1].
b) Change "d
Yes, Henry - that's correct - two releases. The releases are functionally
equivalent, but support two different major versions of HBase.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Just clarifying that Phoenix is trying to do two releases (3.0.0 and
> 4.0.0) at the same
Despite having the best mentors one could hope for, it appears the Apache
Flex PMC missed one thing, which is that all SGAs needed to go through the
IP Clearance process. We did review the IP before it went into the repos,
but we did not fill out forms and get approval from Incubator.
Adobe has m
On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending
> your time going through this. Here's the list of TODOs for us:
> 1) In the binary bundle:
> a) Fix the copy/paste error for the URL to SQLLine in the NOTICE file
> in the bin
Our binary distribution bundles sqlline which has a BSD Clause 3 license.
We've included this license with the Apache 2 license in our LICENSE file.
Do we need to include sqlline in the NOTICE file?
Yes, we bundle ANTLR in our binary distribution. Most of the other items
are pulled in based on the
This probably belongs in a [DISCUSS] more than in a [VOTE] thread, but in
response to Andrew's comment:
> Can we add a "Releasing" page
> to http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/that
> includes step by step instructions for packaging a Phoenix
> release.
...I was wondering if this might be usef
On 25 March 2014 23:06, James Taylor wrote:
> Our binary distribution bundles sqlline which has a BSD Clause 3 license.
> We've included this license with the Apache 2 license in our LICENSE file.
> Do we need to include sqlline in the NOTICE file?
Depends on its license.
> Yes, we bundle ANTLR
Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated
in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead
of listing these in our LICENSE file. Since all licenses are either Apache
or BSD, this should be fine.
I'm still a bit confused about one thing, tho
(sorry, meant instead of listing these in our NOTICE file)
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:48 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated
> in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead
> of listing these in our LICEN
On 25 March 2014 23:48, James Taylor wrote:
> Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated
> in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead
> of listing these in our LICENSE file. Since all licenses are either Apache
> or BSD, this should be
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> HBase is ASF code surely?
> So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some
> attributions that relate to what you are bundling
>
Yes, HBase is ASF code. The other stuff we've listed are the transitive
dependencies of HBase. Do
On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>
>> HBase is ASF code surely?
>> So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some
>> attributions that relate to what you are bundling
>>
>
> Yes, HBase is ASF code. The other stuff we
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> > Yes, we bundle ANTLR in our binary distribution. Most of the other items
> > are pulled in based on the transitive dependencies of other jars we've
> > bundled in our binary distribution.
>
> I see now why I did not notice the 3rd party binaries.
>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor wrote:
> > I think I was confused by the
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-depsinstructions.
>
> What is confusing about that?
> If it is not clear, how could it be made clearer?
>
> The
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > > Yes, we bundle ANTLR in our binary distribution. Most of the other
> items
> > > are pulled in based on the transitive dependencies of other jars we've
> > > bundled in our binary distri
On 26 March 2014 00:39, James Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor wrote:
>> > I think I was confused by the
>> > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-depsinstructions.
>>
>> What is confusing about that?
>> If i
34 matches
Mail list logo
