Hi Folks,
Currently we are working on getting correct package naming implemented
within Apache Usergrid (incubating).
The Usergrid codebase contains SDK's in several languages... no biggie,
however what I am unsure about is how package naming should be implemented
in dotnet [0], html5-javascript[1]
My $0.1: stick with the language rather than with the platform:
*-js/
*-objc/
*-cs/
—FiX
-Original Message-
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Thursday 30 January 2014 19:46
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Package naming for several
On 30.01.2014 21:16, Kowalski, Francois-Xavier wrote:
> My $0.1: stick with the language rather than with the platform:
Because it's well-known that API implementations are never
platform-specific. :)
> *-js/
> *-objc/
> *-cs/
>
>
> —FiX
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbne
>On 30.01.2014 21:16, Kowalski, Francois-Xavier wrote:
>> My $0.1: stick with the language rather than with the platform:
>
>Because it's well-known that API implementations are never
>platform-specific. :)
Sadly, not really. However, languages addressing several platform usually
(with exception
Hi Patrick, prior to any incubator release you should ensure that your
status page is up to date. The "Project Setup" section in particular:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html
Patrick
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following
-1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
looked good, RAT checked out clean and I ran through the release
checklist which looks ok. If you fix the status I'll change my vote to
+1.
A couple nits that I noticed (but not to hold a rel for):
* your notice files should be
Thanks for the reminder Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
> looked good, RAT checked out clean and I ran through the release
> checklist which looks ok. If you fix the status I'll change my vote to
The status page is updated and it looks good to me.
+1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
> looked good, RAT checked out clean and I ran throug
Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 3 IPCM +1 votes and no 0
or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals:
+1:
Matei Zaharia
Andy Konwinski
Henry Saputra*
Jean-Baptiste Onofré*
Patrick Wendell
Patrick Hunt*
0:
-1:
* = binding
Thanks to all those who voted.
- Patrick
On Thu, J
+1 from me:
SIGS and CHECKSUM check out.
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-spark-0.9.0-rc5] mattmann%
$HOME/bin/stage_apache_rc spark 0.9.0-incubating
http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.9.0-incubating-rc5/
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
As usual, thanks for driving the release Patrick =)
- Henry
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 3 IPCM +1 votes and no 0
> or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals:
>
> +1:
> Matei Zaharia
> Andy Konwinski
> Henry Sapu
Hi Sergio,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. The issue is that you are
building with JDK 1.7.x and Oozie is using maven-enforcer-plugin to check
if its 1.6.x. Appreciate if you could rerun maven with JDK 1.6.x and see if
it works for you.
[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0:enfo
Hey Patrick,
We’ve already had two approved Incubator releases and gone through those items,
so is it possible to not block the release on this status page? It seems
orthogonal to having a release.
Matei
On Jan 30, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being u
13 matches
Mail list logo
