I'm in favour of trying this. And its just experiment remember so not
a change for ever for all podlings so please people try to support it
or at least not try to block it.
...ant
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> The possibility of an experiment with making PPMC votes
I've not managed to keep up with things here recently. I've nit read
all the context or conclusions, so my comment here may be moot but I
just want to make sure that the proposal to only require a single
binding vote for releases has been properly thought through (unless
already rejected).
There a
Do these sort of experiments really need consensus? The Incubator PMC
is so big and diverse now it makes getting consensus on some things
all most impossible, after the change a little while back we don't
even need consensus for voting in new Incubator PMC members now.
...ant
On Sat, Nov 23, 2
On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
(...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
of the conflict is being discussing: how bit is the Incubator PMC right now?
Because I only see a group of about 20-30 people dis
Currently listed at 180+.
Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
> > (...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
>
> Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
> of the conflict is being
On 19 November 2013 08:29, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...
>>> My guess is that "Lazy Majority" is used because Majority implies more than
>>> 50% of possible voters need to vote.
>>
>> My guess is
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our fourth
> release at Apache.
>
> Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it
On 19 November 2013 02:50, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third
> release at Apache.
>
> Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that ma
I see that 0.7.0 has been released.
However there was no [VOTE][RESULT] mail as far as I can tell.
On 23 November 2013 14:36, sebb wrote:
> On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> Helix 0.7.0-incubati
On 20 November 2013 13:45, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
> mailing list and the community has approved the second release
> candidate(RC1) for Apache Hadoo
On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
>
> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0
> -1's or +0's and now
> requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org.
>
> The [VOTE]
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997
The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifacts that we package as
binaries. Do we need to go through the entire release proces
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we release. Do we
need to go through the entire release process again?
--
Hi:
Closing the vote since it has passed 72 hours.
Here is the result:
+1: 3 (binding)
Patrick Hunt
Olivier Lamy
Mahadev Konar
-1: 0
The vote has passed (pending a response to the email below), thanks a lot to
everyone for voting, thanks to the
mentors for all the support!
Cheers,
The Helix
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997
>
> The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifacts that we package
> a
On 23 November 2013 20:00, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
>
> The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we release. Do
> w
On 23 November 2013 20:01, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Closing the vote since it has passed 72 hours.
>
> Here is the result:
>
> +1: 3 (binding)
> Patrick Hunt
> Olivier Lamy
> Mahadev Konar
>
> -1: 0
>
> The vote has passed (pending a response to the email below), thanks a lot to
> every
I'm not a mentor, but I can answer that. I believe Zhen isn't subscribed to
this mailing list. Consequently, his result email was sent, but not yet
approved by the mailing list moderator.
> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:31:14 +
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOT
No, the current release doesn't have a NOTICE file at the top level. The
subcomponents we intended for release (i.e. helix-core, helix-agent,
helix-examples, and helix-admin-webapp) all have LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and
NOTICE files. If we need a NOTICE file in the top level, then we'll have to
re-
On 23 November 2013 22:07, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> No, the current release doesn't have a NOTICE file at the top level.
Are you sure about that?
I checked the file helix-0.6.2-incubating-src.zip and it seems to have
NOTICE and LICENSE files in the correct place.
Are you referring to somethin
Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
license-maven-plugin in the build/package stage. In that case, is this an
acceptable solution, or is an explicit NOTICE file still required?
Olivier, can you provide some context?
> Date
On 23 November 2013 23:47, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
> license-maven-plugin in the build/package stage. In that case, is this an
> acceptable solution, or is an explicit NOTICE file still required?
Every ASF distribution must
> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:53:13 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
> From: seb...@gmail.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> On 23 November 2013 23:47, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
>> Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
>> license-maven-plugin i
23 matches
Mail list logo
