Re: Apache project bylaws

On 10/2/13 12:58 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> I would like to propose a rewrite of [1] by borrowing heavily from [2] >>but >> making sure to emphasize that projects are allowed to have different >>rules >> for all of them (or is the code-c

Re: [VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project

And here is my +1 I'll prepare the result mail. *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

[RESULT][VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project

The vote for BatchEE to become an incubated project has passed with 9 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding votes, and no -1 or 0 votes. *Binding +1 Votes:* Olivier Lamy Bertrand Delacretaz Jean-Baptiste Onofré Christian Müller Matt Benson Mark Struberg Matthias Wessendorf Gerhard Petracek Tammo van

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Christian Müller joins the IPMC

Thanks for the warm welcome. Because I'm a newbie here, be aware of stupid questions... ;-) Best, Christian Am 03.10.2013 08:02 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" : > Congrats! > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Christian Müller joins the IPMC

Congrats! :) On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the warm welcome. Because I'm a newbie here, be aware of stupid > questions... ;-) > > Best, > Christian > Am 03.10.2013 08:02 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" : > > > Congrats! > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling

+1 On 3 October 2013 09:45, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > As discussed previously on general@incubator[1], the Tashi community has voted > to retire from the Incubator. Following the retirement guide[2], it is now > time for an IPMC vote ratifying their decision. > > [ ] +1 Retire the Ta

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

Sounds good for me too. On 2 October 2013 18:19, Mark Struberg wrote: > -1 for Merlin. Just too widely used :( > There are 10++ pages of trademarks in all fields in trademarkia, many of them > in the software area > > > > +1 for Sirona as it has a nice meaning and it seems to not be used for an

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

works for me too *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/10/3 Olivier Lamy >

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

No problem, that sounds good as well. JLouis 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau > works for me too > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedi

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

Dear all, thanks for your support! The 72 hours have now passed and we have 8 positive votes, of which 3 are binding and 5 are non-binding. We now have the required number of positive binding votes and will therefore proceed with the release. The remark by sebb has been added as an issue for the

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

It works for me. Regards JB On 10/02/2013 10:19 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: -1 for Merlin. Just too widely used :( There are 10++ pages of trademarks in all fields in trademarkia, many of them in the software area +1 for Sirona as it has a nice meaning and it seems to not be used for any soft

Re: Apache project bylaws

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > On 10/2/13 12:58 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: >> Rather than a "rewrite", I suggest proposing small, incremental, reversible >> changes. Governance is easy to mess up. > > Well, "small, incremental" was hard to do given the significantly > di

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling

+1 On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > As discussed previously on general@incubator[1], the Tashi community has > voted > to retire from the Incubator. Following the retirement guide[2], it is now > time for an IPMC vote ratifying their decision. > > [ ] +1 Ret

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling

+1 Regards, Alan On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > [ ] +1 Retire the Tashi podling > [ ] +0 Neither here nor there > [ ] -1 Do not retire the podling because ...

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling

+1 LieGrue, strub > > From: Alan D. Cabrera >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2013, 16:34 >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling > > >+1 > >Regards, >Alan > >On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> [ ] +1

Re: Apache project bylaws

On 10/3/13 6:23 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: >On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> On 10/2/13 12:58 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > >>> Rather than a "rewrite", I suggest proposing small, incremental, >>>reversible >>> changes. Governance is easy to mess up. >> >> Well, "smal

Re: Apache project bylaws

Good Lord man all you need to add is a one-sentence statement that personnel votes are consensus votes not procedural (simple majority) votes. On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 10/3/13 6:23 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Alex Harui w

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > As discussed previously on general@incubator[1], the Tashi community has voted > to retire from the Incubator. Following the retirement guide[2], it is now > time for an IPMC vote ratifying their decision. > > [ ] +1 Retire the

Re: Apache project bylaws

For committership, that is typical. Most PMCs allow a veto for adding new members to the PMC. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > Good Lord man all you need to add is a one-sentence > statement that personnel votes are consensus votes not > procedural (simple majority) votes

[RESULTS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

I am officially closing the vote. We have 11 binding +1 votes, 4 non-binding votes and no -1 notes. Usergrid is now officially part of the Apache Incubator. Thanks to everybody who helped put together the proposal, those who joined the discussion, those who voted and the Usergrid community. +1 bin

Re: Apache project bylaws

The definitions are in a glossary somewhere, the more we denormalize the locations of our common understandings the harder it will be to maintain sanity over discussions. Projects don't need to be encouraged to write their own bylaws, most don't bother and that's proper. We don't need to spell ev

Re: Apache project bylaws

On 10/3/13 8:48 AM, "Joseph Schaefer" wrote: >Good Lord man all you need to add is a one-sentence >statement that personnel votes are consensus votes not >procedural (simple majority) votes. Hmm. Maybe I'm reaching too far, but my hope was to put in this document a definition of consensus and a

Re: [RESULTS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

Welcome to ASF incubator Usergrid =) - Henry On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Dave wrote: > I am officially closing the vote. We have 11 binding +1 votes, 4 > non-binding votes and no -1 notes. Usergrid is now officially part of the > Apache Incubator. Thanks to everybody who helped put together

Re: Apache project bylaws

On 10/3/13 9:51 AM, "Joseph Schaefer" wrote: >The definitions are in a glossary somewhere, the more >we denormalize the locations of our common understandings >the harder it will be to maintain sanity over discussions. OK, found the glossary. I will try to leverage it more in the next revision

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Tashi podling

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:45:31PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > As discussed previously on general@incubator[1], the Tashi community has voted > to retire from the Incubator. Following the retirement guide[2], it is now > time for an IPMC vote ratifying their decision. > > [ ] +1