On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
Can you clarify what this means
Hi Daniel,
Am 19.11.2012 um 06:53 schrieb dsh:
> A few comments in regards to the proposal draft and "linked data"
> specifically:
>
> * maybe consider calling out that you are striving towards implementing the
> Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C draft (at least that's how I understand the
> proposal
Hi Paolo,
You are right, the discussion on the list shows we should explain a bit more
about the general idea. We will add a paragraph to the proposal and some more
links to background material. ;-)
Am 19.11.2012 um 00:45 schrieb Paolo Castagna:
> On 19/11/12 01:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
Hi,
> out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even complement Eclipse
> Lyo [1]? For instance is Lyo one of the Enterprise Linked Data scenarios
> which you have been mentioning above?
>
> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/lyo/
>
Eclipse Lyo is focused on OSLC (Open Services for Lifecycle C
Hi,
we were internally discussing that the project would benefit a lot from
having a mentor outside of the core Semantic Web community. Then he/she
could help us to address those issues of which are not fully aware when
you work so close in a topic. For instance, someone from the REST
communi
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
>> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub
On 20 November 2012 11:18, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende
>> wrote:
>>> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>>> discussion between the two projects, we are seekin
This is good point of view.
I think one may also take a user cases and product distribution
perspectives into account. For example, when both projects naturally come
in one binary release, this may be feasible to have them joined.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov /
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> ...Bertrand, this is a great opportunity to clarify the board's attitude
> toward 'subprojects'. Ever since the campaign to dismantle umbrellas,
> I've been confused about what structures the board would find
> reasonable
I don't kno
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> ...Where I start to get worried is when a sub-project takes on a life of
> its own and significant portions of the parent PMC are not interested
> in the sub-project...
I didn't notice this new thread, but my reply in the other one matches t
The voting period has now closed. The results are as follows:
IPMC Member Votes
-1: 0
0: 0
+1: 8
Non-binding Votes
-1: 0
0: 0
+1: 7
The vote is ***SUCCESSFUL***
Voting Record (* denotes an IPMC Member):
Jason Letourneau: +1
* Suresh Marru:+1
* Jukka Zitting: +1
* Ross Gardler:
Fromt he peanut gallery of someone who has participated in a number of
sub-projects
over the years (Nutch, Tika, Solr, Hadoop, etc.): I don't think they have a big
place at the
ASF. The word "project" implies "community". Sub communities == umbrella
projects ==
pain, and suffering.
OTOH, sub-"
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende
> >
> wrote:
> > ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> > discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to
> allow
> > graduation of Apache Nuvem
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...The idea is to have Nuvem become something like Tuscany Cloud Components,
> and the active Nuvem PPMC members, which mostly are already Tuscany PMC,
> will be joining the Tuscany PMC.
>
> Does that answer your doubts ?...
Yes, thanks!
-
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> This is good point of view.
>
> I think one may also take a user cases and product distribution
> perspectives into account. For example, when both projects naturally come
> in one binary release, this may be feasible to have them joined.
>
>
Could agree more with Chris and Ross.
I've seen, first hand, at Hadoop the behaviour of significant portions of the
PMC not being present in one of the 3 sub-projects we have (HDFS, YARN,
MapReduce) and has led to significant issues in the community and in the PMC.
Along with folks like Chris I
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (u
Hi all,
> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
There are several other projects who do use the same tools. Cloudstack even
list on the
What does gpg --verify do?
http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
> there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (unlike -c for md5sum lets
> say). Worse yet, because of t
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> What does gpg --verify do?
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
It verifies the GPG sig (as it should). I wasn't able to
find (well, by spending 2 minutes searching through
the man page on my Linux) an easy way to ask it
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
>
> Turns out, this is the
On 20 November 2012 21:20, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
>> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubato
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>
> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
And this is the crux of the question -- what IS suitable format?
Perso
On 20 November 2012 23:22, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>>
>> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
>> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
>
> And this i
24 matches
Mail list logo
