Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

2012-01-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, What's the status of this effort? I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (R) for each project. Please branch any followup discussion about specifi

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> 2008-01-06 RAT > > S: Looking to graduate but stuck with (self-inflicted?) bureacracy. > R: Push to graduate within Q1. Rat is stalled on trademarks Robert - To unsubs

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

2012-01-08 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Jukka, On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> 2010-02-21 SIS > > S: Last activity in November > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sis-dev/20.mbox/browser) > R: Retire unless activity picks up in Q1. As a SIS mentor I'd say this is fair, but my personal gut

Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Benson Margulies
This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution. Some of our non-graduating podlings have a common problem. They look good in all ways except growth. This inhibits graduation from 2.5 standpoints: 1) they are dubiously la

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

2012-01-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for > a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for > my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (R) for each project. Excellent work! This i

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > c) graduate them, but with some conditions. Apache already fixes inquorate (too small) TLPs (by moving to attic or rebooting). Dead TLPs are discovered by the board when no report is submitted. The problem for the IPMC is understanding

[VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Struberg
Dear IPMC, dear Community! The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE on graduating as a TLP. The podling is in the incubator since 2010 and successfully shipped 3 releases and establi

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Mark Struberg > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2012 10:04 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP > > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apac

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Benson Margulies
> If the Incubator is not sure that a podling is small but healthy, then > would the board be in a better position to make that judgement after > graduation? In the case at hand (Isis), I'd propose that the IPMC could assert that they are healthy -- with an asterix. Never having seen them incorpor

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2012/1/8 Mark Struberg > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed > implementation of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like > to start a VOTE on graduating as a TLP. > The podling is in the incubator

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > For better readability, the Resolution text is also available in our WIKI [2] > > Please VOTE on recommending BVAL as a TLP > > [+1] graduate BVAL as a TLP > > [+0] don't care > > [-1] nope, because (fill in) -1 (sorry) http://incubator.apac

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 On Sunday, January 8, 2012, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2012/1/8 Mark Struberg > >> >> >> Dear IPMC, dear Community! >> >> The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed >> implementation of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1 (binding). G'luck Mark and rest of the team! Cheers, Chris On Jan 8, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation > of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to sta

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Robert! Thanks for checking! I did update  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/beanvalidation.xml a few hours ago. What do I need to run to pick this changes up on the page? txs and LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Robert Burrel

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi Robert! > > Thanks for checking! Thanks for getting back so quick :-) > I did update > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/beanvalidation.xml > a few hours ago. Based on that record, I'm now +1 >

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > the voices here advocating squashing podlings that don't graduate in > some fixed time interval [citation needed] As someone who has been vocal on the subject, I have been very careful to NOT suggest automatic termination, but instead i

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Struberg
ok, reading the docs really helps sometimes ;) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/README.txt Just did run ./build.sh and committed the changes in site-publish. Should get picked up soon. txs and LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Robert Burrell Donkin >

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Struberg
Isis did pick up a few committers, but it's not a project which grows as fast as others of course. We should try to get at bit more folks interrested. But they have 3, 4 frequent committers which do a very good job. And the team has really good community skills! Thus I'm not yet particularly w

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 good luck!! On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation > of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE > on graduating as a TLP. > The pod

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Benson Margulies
Sam, Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of messages about squashing stale podlings, how about this adjustment to my presentation: 1. OK, let's forget about dumping aged podlings 2. The third option I presented was 'graduate with an asterix'. However, I didn't really intend

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation > of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE > on graduating as a TLP. > The podling is in the in

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Sam, > > Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of messages > about squashing stale podlings, how about this adjustment to my > presentation: > > 1. OK, let's forget about dumping aged podlings We have quite a number of "

[VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating(RC7)

2012-01-08 Thread Devin Han
Hi all, The ODF Toolkit 0.5 is ready for release. This will be our first incubator release. We had a preliminary vote in the PPMC, which had great results, including a +1 from our mentor, Yegor. The PPMC vote result thread is here: http://markmail.org/message/tw3juzkak6kdiod2 The vote thread is

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Benson Margulies
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> Sam, >> >> Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of messages >> about squashing stale podlings, how about this adjustment to my >> presentation: >> >> 1. OK, let's fo

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Matt Benson
+1 Matt On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation > of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE > on graduating as a TLP. > The podling is

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread sebb
On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation > of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE > on graduating as a TLP. > The podling is in the incubator

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-08 Thread Kalle Korhonen
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a > thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution. > Some of our non-graduating podlings have a common problem. They look > good in all ways except growth. This in

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Struberg
> I'm not sure I follow the sentence after "related to". > > implementation of what? > > Do the validators and extensions relate to JSR-303? > Or are they independent? > Is this Java-only software, or could other languages be used? Yes, this is Java-only software as it's an implementation of the