On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 22:25, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> But if the team already agrees that the changes need to be made, why
>>> not do so and re-roll?
>>
>> I'd just leave that up to the releas
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The context for this is the discussion here -
> http://markmail.org/message/rsxjgrrufc6khlqy?q=overhead+list:org.apache.incubator.general
>
> This was a long discussion with no clear answers.
>
> We would like to know if it is OK to
Wow, exciting proposal.
Curious if infra is already accepting git for this podling. Have your
reached out to them already?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
> Apache DeltaSpike project to t
+1
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> There has been concerns expressed about accumulation of rules without
> pruning. In that spirit, I'd like to find out whether the community
> feels that dropping the rule would be better than revising it into
> something workable.
Yes, we reached out to them quite a while ago (informally). Board was also
involved.
Also please note that almost all of the involved contributors are long time GIT
users already!
I also have personally reserved quite a few days to help out Infra with setting
up the environment.
LieGrue,
str
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> +1
(Oops, I didn't explain very well)
With a POLL, you need to pick one of the option.
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I am sorry, didn't see the poll options. Thought it was just a heads
up if this needs to be changed.
[X] Drop Suitable Name Search
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> +1
>
> (Oops, I didn't ex
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The Httpd release description [1] says:
"For the ASF to release the candidate tarball/archive, at least three
project members must vote affirmatively for release, a
+1 (binding)
PS: Updated the proposal to re-add myself as Mentor...
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
> Apache DeltaSpike project to the Incubator.
>
> We have added the initial proposal to t
+1
From: sebb
Sent: 11/30/2011 3:53 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RFC] Proposed voting description edits
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The Httpd
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Relea
Hey Robert, its not clear to me why a suitable name search should be dropped -
is that because the brand team will do this search on a projects behalf?
I see nameprotect is outdated, but a quick search by project members to see if
there are conflicts is still probably a good thing. It just might
On 30 November 2011 14:11, Leo Simons wrote:
> Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
> for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
> illuminating for some.
>
> cheerio,
>
> - Leo
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> On Fri,
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> PS: Updated the proposal to re-add myself as Mentor...
>
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the
Mmm, shouldn't voting be carried out in a separate "[VOTE] Accept
DeltaSpike..." thread?
Matt
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> PS: Updated the proposal to re-
yup the [VOTE] mail is currently planed for next monday.
I will interpret any +1 as a frenetic 'wooohooo ye' until then ;)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Matt Benson
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re:
Hi,
On 16 November 2011 20:47, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> PLEASE NOTE!
>
> From the ASF Board:
>
> For now on, all reports to the board for review/inclusion at the
> board meetings will now be due 1 WEEK before the meeting. Reports
> submitted late will be declined and you'll need to resubmit t
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> yup the [VOTE] mail is currently planed for next monday.
>
>
> I will interpret any +1 as a frenetic 'wooohooo ye' until then ;)
+1 :)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Matt Benson
>> To: general@incubat
On 2011-11-16 21:53, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this.
>
> Like Stefan I cannot seem to find the handy reminder e-mail that usually
> comes on the first day of the reporting month. Neither in my in
Hi,
The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/LICENSE
The previous vote thread or release artifacts are here -
http:/
Also, we haven't ignored the fact that the NOTICE file must ideally be as
short as possible.
To track this issue, we've filed a bug -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-219 and will be fixing it for
the next release.
Thanks,
Neha
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
I notice that the NOTICE has this incomplete statement:
This product includes the scala runtime and compiler
(www.scala-lang.org) developed by EPFL, which includes
the following license:
There is not any following license.
I also notice that the LICENSE file has copyright notices.
- D
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-11-16 21:53, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> ...I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this...
> Do you want us to report next month instead?
I'd say yes, report at the next opportun
23 matches
Mail list logo
