On 8 October 2011 08:49, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:25 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 October 2011 02:08, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 October 2011 00:47, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Updated to use new format and committed.
>>
>> Output is to project-menu.tmp file currently; edit build
I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
>>
>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout
>> changes. You are already working on the next steps :-)
>
> I'm not keen on losing the RH podling list, if that's what you mean; I
> think it's useful.
You wa
On 9 October 2011 13:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
>>>
>>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout
>>> changes. You are already working on the next steps :-)
>>
>> I'm not keen on losing the RH podling li
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:39AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> Although JSON is simpler, it does not allow comments AFAIK, which I
> think rules it out as a suitable original source file.
For the record: indeed, JSON as spec'd in RFC 4627 does not allow comments.
Some parser implementations support vario
sebb wrote:
> Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
> >>>
> >>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout
> >>> changes. You are already working on the next steps :-)
> >>
> >> I'm not keen on losing the RH podling
On 10 October 2011 02:02, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>> > I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout
>> >>> changes. You are already working on the next s
sebb wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >> Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I have added my layout changes too (website not updated). We need to
> >> > find a consens on the rh table. I am still not a fan of this, it
> >> > simply ugly. We have spoken on this thread about gene