Carl, do you have any markmail or nabble links at hand?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> From: Carl Trieloff
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.2.0
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 9:17 PM
> On 02/21/2011 01:02 PM,
I proposed Howl as an Incubator project and the feedback was
positive. The only concern listed was a naming clash, which in the
end did not seem to be considered a problem. You can see the thread
at http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9.
Can I now propose a vote for acceptance, or do I need a Incuba
Hi Alan,
I think you can open the vote.
Example:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--ALOIS-to-enter-the-incubator-td29544156.html
Cheers,
Christian
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> I proposed Howl as an Incubator project and the feedback was positive. The
> only concern listed wa
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 16:23 +, Mark Struberg wrote:
> I'm not really fit with ruby projects, but there are quite a few sources with
> LGPL license headers. e.g.
> ./lib/deltacloud/drivers/opennebula/opennebula_driver.rb
Yes, it seems the three files in
server/lib/deltacloud/drivers/opennebul
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubator
project. The proposal is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HowlProposal
. You can see the discussion from the proposal thread at http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9
.
Alan.
--
Abstract
Howl is a table and
I grepped through all *.rb files which don't have the apache license URL in it
and compared this list with the find . -name *.rb. Think there were more than 3
misses, but don't remember in detail anymore.
anyway -1 for the 0.2 release and +1 for the relicense.
Please also record this fact in th
Btw, the release should be named deltacloud-0.2.0-incubating!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 2/23/11, Mark Struberg wrote:
> From: Mark Struberg
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.2.0
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2011, 7:06 AM
> I grepped through all *
