Here's a pretty silly question. Do podlings maintain a distinction
between PMC and committers, or is a podling PMC in fact the set of
people with commit access?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Fo
Hi
The following votes were recieved (I hope I did get the binding and
non-binding right):
binding: +1 Benson Margulies
+1 Craig L Russell
+1 Niclas Hedhman
non-binding: +1 Christian Grobmeier
+1 Scott Deboy
+1 Mohammad Nour El-
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Congratulations and welcome!
Just for the record, Scott Deboys and my vote are binding too.
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Hi
>
> The following votes were recieved (I hope I did get the binding and
> non-binding right):
>
> binding: +1 Benson Margulies
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Here's a pretty silly question. Do podlings maintain a distinction
> between PMC and committers, or is a podling PMC in fact the set of
> people with commit access?
That's up to the podling as for graduated projects.
-Bertrand
-
Most podlings start out with the PPMC == mentors plus all committers
on the initial list.
Then, some podlings adopt new committers and make them PPMC members at
the same time.
Others allow new committers some time to "season" before making them
PPMC members.
YMMV
Craig
On Sep 21, 2010
: Most podlings start out with the PPMC == mentors plus all committers on the
: initial list.
not "Most", "All". It's the formal definition of the initial PPMC...
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
"Initially, it is composed of the Podling's mentors
and initia
