Sorry for shaking things up, but it sounds like you got the gist of things.
Using OSGi services to wire up Chatterbot makes it much more flexible in
the long run allowing developers/users to plug in alternative
implementations of things if they want to. I'm quite happy to join your
project as a c
Hi,
We would like to incubate the project Dalesa at Apache incubator and join
Apache Software Foundation.
You can find the proposal at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DalesaProposal.
Dalesa is a P2P web cache which could become an alternative to existing
centralised web caches like Squid. At the
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A draft OODT report has been submitted to the Incubator wiki.
> Comments/updates from mentors and from the OODT/incubator community are
> welcome.
Cool - thanks! I made some minor tweaks, so please review. Namely,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I think this will be promoted now, after the recent license header
> issues in another podling...
+1
once i have a minute, i planned to drawing up additional policy
- robert
---
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:59 -0600, Eric Evans wrote:
> Please cast your vote:
> [ ] +1 to recommend Cassandra's graduation
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, (because...)
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
The vote passes with 13 binding +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1
Thanks Ant and Mark,
If someone wouldn't mind looking over the release artifacts and casting
a vote, it would
be very much appreciated by the Kato podling.
Thanks,
Stuart
Stuart Monteith
http://blog.stoo.me.uk
On 30 Jan 2010, at 08:29, ant elder wrote:
> +1
>
> ...ant
>
>
Thanks Justin!
I went ahead and updated the incubator site oodt.xml document in
incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/oodt.xml with the February 2010
report based off the wiki:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=905884&view=rev
Is there a command I can run to rebuild the site or is some au
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Thanks Justin!
>
> I went ahead and updated the incubator site oodt.xml document in
> incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/oodt.xml with the February 2010
> report based off the wiki:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=90
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
(We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2349)
This would mean that any commits made to the site-publish tree would
automatically be deployed to the site. No more
+1 from me on this - I'd see the OODT changes more quickly, right?
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/2/10 10:57 PM, "Justin Erenkrantz" wrote:
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
(We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> +1 from me on this - I'd see the OODT changes more quickly, right?
Indeed! Your note re: OODT is what triggered me to send this email.
=P -- justin
-
To unsubs
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
+1!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
+1 from me too!
Cheers,
Tommaso
2010/2/3 Jukka Zitting
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
>
> +1!
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---
+0.9
I agree that the site update process is cumbersome, but it also gives
podling folks an incentive to log on to p.a.o and learn to use that
system to their advantage. Moving to svnpubsub would take that away.
That said, I think that most committers never have to go to p.a.o in
any case so perh
> -Original Message-
> From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 5:28 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?
>
> +0.9
>
> I agree that the site update process is cumbersome, bu
15 matches
Mail list logo