Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> In addition, it has been almost four months since our last attempt at
> graduation, and we believe that the issues brought up during the previous
> graduation vote [1] [2] have been resolved.
Agreed. Quoting my comment to the last Pivot
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Agreed. Quoting my comment to the last Pivot report [1]: "I've been
> watching Pivot since the first graduation vote attempt, and can
> confirm the positive development since then. +1 to a new graduation
> proposal as soon as the community f
On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>
>>> IIRC, Martijn has offered a proper legal review in the place of a
> "release".
>>> This sounded pretty reasonable to me. I would agree to that.
>
>> Yup. I've already stated that I have no problems with running RAT an
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Ironically, when the Incubator first formed, podlings could NOT do a release
>> and many yelled about it.
>
> Yes, the originally reason behind it, iirc, was so podlings had a reason
>>>the draconian release process. ;-)
Actually it is quite true. Last time I released OpenWebBeans, it took
nearly 1 month :) Besides, it is also very helpful to understand Apache way
release procedures.
--Gurkan
2009/11/16 Jukka Zitting
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jim Jagielski
Dunno. Lots of java packages have had to deal with the issue as they
migrate to the ASF. I'm sure that gene...@incubator (cc'd) has some
prior knowledge and precedent.
Cheers,
-g
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:47, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> What does the migration mean for JavaHL's package namespace
The Incubator is running smoothly, with nothing requiring the Board's
attention at this time.
The big news is no longer news: Subversion has been accepted into the
Incubator.
On other news, Pivot looks set to graduate, and is actively preparing to do
so. WSRP4J appears to have finally cleared it
On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+
> committers have access and are beginning work within the ASF repo.
> Below, you can see the big change to switch the licensing over to the
> ASF (we were already on ALv2, so thi
Hey hey,
I've checked in on Pivot now and again and reviewing recent
activities, I think its definitely ready to leave the nest! I will be
happy to vote +1 when it comes to a vote.
cheers,
Leo
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The feeling among the members of the Pivot pod
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I am curious (never worked in a RTC environment);
Does that mean that people turn down offers of commit rights? Does it
mean that less commit rights are offered? Does it mean that commit
rights are offered to those that do reviews even if they don't write
much code?
No to
Hi,
reading http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, it says (towards
the end) to add new PPMC members to this SVN file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/incubator-info.txt
but, I get a 404 not found on that URL. Where do I add new PPMC members
for our projec
I have been following Pivot's dev list since August. My only concern involves
an incident where I posted a suggestion and was slapped down very hard by one
of the committers. If this had been my first exposure to the ASF I never would
have come back. That being said, I quickly got an offline ap
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache. In
this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this will
create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely possible to
create a separate jar containing the necessary glue code to ma
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+
> committers have access and are beginning work within the ASF repo.
> Below, you can see the big change to switch the licensing over to the
> ASF (we were already on ALv2, so
The OpenWebBeans Status page links directly to apache.org /dist
Please see the ASF mirror guidelines, which emphatically say
to use the mirrors. So either set up your own mirrors script
(preferred because then you can show Incubator notice),
or use the default one, e.g.
http://www.apache.org/dyn/c
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
Yes, I can only recall that the only exceptions has been where there
are some formal specification backing the project, JSRs, the OSGi spec
and the Jini spec comes to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
>
> Yes, I can only recall that the only exceptions has been where there
> are some formal specification
On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote:
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of
org.apache.
Yes, I can only recall that the only exceptions has been where there
are some formal specification backing the
18 matches
Mail list logo
