> [X ] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gang,
>
> Apache Pivot is one of the fastest moving codebases at Apache, and the
> Pivot team has done an excellent job, both technically as well as
> community-wise. The initial team consisting of two Vmware employees
> showed good commun
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
[x] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
[ ] 0, I don't care
[ ] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I w
Hi,
[x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
I'm not seeing sufficient diversity of active committers [1] and not
too many people seem to be contributing patches [2]. My suggestion
would be for Pivot to spend some more time growing the community
before graduation.
[1] http://www
2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting :
> Hi,
>
> [x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
>
> I'm not seeing sufficient diversity of active committers [1] and not
> too many people seem to be contributing patches [2]. My suggestion
> would be for Pivot to spend some more time growing the communi
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> 2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting :
>> Hi,
>>
>> [x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
>>
>> I'm not seeing sufficient diversity of active committers [1] and not
>> too many people seem to be contributing patches [2]. My suggestion
>> w
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> As I understand it there is sufficient diversity in the people with
> binding votes to provide oversight for the project. That is what we
> are trying to achieve here. I didn't hear this argument against Apache
> Sling which has a less dive
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Martijn
Dashorst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> 2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
>>>
>>> I'm not seeing sufficient diversity of active committers [1] and not
>>> too ma
Its still good to have some minimal diversity of the active committers
and right now it looks like Pivot only has two people actively
committing code and they're both from the same employer.
It may be worth noting that Pivot is not technically a "VMware
project". Todd and I work on Pivot on o
I wouldn't recommend using these tools for your "community" discussions, though.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Angela Cymbalak wrote:
>> I've been spending more than my fair share of time on Facebook lately. Are
>> we allowed to set up a
Second the notion that while it's ok to have a Facebook page, it
should redirect *all* project discussions to the official Apache
mailing lists.
I don't know the social conventions of Facebook very well, and if "off
[Facebook] site" discussions are not part of the norm, then it might
be d
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Angela Cymbalak wrote:
> I've been spending more than my fair share of time on Facebook lately. Are
> we allowed to set up a Facebook page for the project? Just not sure since
> we are in incubation? What about a Twitter feed? Can we do those without
> breaking
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM, James Carman wrote:
> I wouldn't recommend using these tools for your "community" discussions,
> though.
>
Totally agree, I don' t believe this was the idea.
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blo
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Angela Cymbalak wrote:
>
>> I've been spending more than my fair share of time on Facebook lately. Are
>> we allowed to set up a Facebook page for the project? Just not sure since
>> we are in incubation? Wha
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Angela Cymbalak >wrote:
> >
> >> I've been spending more than my fair share of time on Facebook lately.
> Are
> >> we allowed to set up a Facebook p
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> That Facebook page hasn't seen a wall post for five months, or a discussion
> since 2007...
>
> OK, so let's say we set up a Facebook page for PhotArk. Maybe we announce it
> by writing on the ASF page's wall. Don't people have to become a "
And my big question: if we are allowed to do this, I think I read
somewhere that we aren't allowed to refer to the project as Apache
PhotArk yet because we are still a podling. What is the proper way
to refer to the podling?
Angie
At 02:56 PM 8/3/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Angela Cymbalak wrote:
> And my big question: if we are allowed to do this, I think I read somewhere
> that we aren't allowed to refer to the project as Apache PhotArk yet because
> we are still a podling. What is the proper way to refer to the podling?
>
> Angie
>
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Sling explicitly waited until there were active committers from three
> independent backgrounds until asking for graduation.
>
> At the end of the day it's the people who write the code that decide
> where a project goes,
So, you ARE saying t
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> Sling explicitly waited until there were active committers from three
>> independent backgrounds until asking for graduation.
>>
>> At the end of the day it's the people who write the code that decide
>> where a proj
20 matches
Mail list logo
