Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-20 Thread Felix Meschberger
+1 Regards Felix Karl Pauls schrieb: > Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message > and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We > ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with Karl

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-20 Thread Toni Menzel
+1 (non binding) On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Felix > > Karl Pauls schrieb: > > Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache > > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message > > and as a wiki page at http

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-20 Thread francesco . furfari
+1 (non binding vote) francesco On 4/19/2009, "Karl Pauls" wrote: >Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache >Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message >and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We >ask the Incubator

[PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, As you may have noticed, a proposal for a new incubating project, tentatively called Apache Chemistry, is currently being prepared. See below for the full wiki source of the current status of the proposal. Instead of waiting until we have all the TODOs (and some incoherencies) worked out I wa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/4/20 Jukka Zitting : > As you may have noticed, a proposal for a new incubating project, > tentatively called Apache Chemistry, is currently being prepared. See > below for the full wiki source of the current status of the proposal. No comments on the proposal, but I do have a comment on the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > No comments on the proposal, but I do have a comment on the name. > > Coming from the academic sector my heart soared when I saw this name. > I thought there was a proposal that would be of interest to my target > domain. Obviously it do

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Jukka, "cemantics" ? thanks, dims On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> No comments on the proposal, but I do have a comment on the name. >> >> Coming from the academic sector my heart soared when I saw this nam

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread Yeliz Eseryel
Ross, I thought of the same thing. Hahaha, it seems academicians think along the same lines. Although it seems from Jukka's email that fair amount of consideration went into the decision. -- Yeliz Eseryel Ph.D Candidate in Information Science & Technology Syracuse University School of Informati

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread sebb
There seem to be quite a few Java projects that relate to Chemistry - what if Apache later wants to create its own Chemistry project? Although the name Chemistry is quite neat, I think it would be a waste (as well as confusing) to use it for something totally unrelated. If the abbreviation CMIS b

Re: [VOTE] Olio 0.1 Release

2009-04-20 Thread Craig L Russell
Can anyone else please take a look at the Olio podling release? Thanks, Craig On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Ok. I'll vote +1 for this release. These then fall into the category of licenses that aren't explicit in the distribution although they are clearly licensed

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

2009-04-20 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 4/21/09, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Jukka, > > "cemantics" ? :-) Robert > > thanks, > dims > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Ross Gardler >> wrote: >>> No comments on the proposal, but I do have a comment on the name.