Hello all,
The 72 hour window on voting on this release is complete.
The following Incubator PMCs cast votes on this release:
+1
ant elder
Carsten Ziegeler
Craig L Russell
Jeremias Maerki
Jukka Zitting
The vote passes. Thanks to everyone for reviewing this release and
coming up with s
> As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
> of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
> broken links.
OK. And nice of you to fix it. I don't believe that this requires a vote,
and can be addressed by lazy consensus.
--- Noel
-
> Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
> infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build,
> maintain, and release non-ASF releases. To be sure in the case of
> JSecurity the final artifacts will not use the ASF mirrors but that
> does not hide the fa
On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
broken links.
OK. And nice of you to fix it. I don't believe that this requires
a vote,
and can be addressed by lazy consensus.
-1
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>> As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
>>> of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
>>> broken links.
>>
>> OK. And nice of you to fix i
Craig Russell wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
>>> of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
>>> broken links.
>> OK. And nice of you to fix it. I don't believe that this requires
>> a vote, and can be addressed by lazy consensus.
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 12:52, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I think its the other way round - requiring a vote for any change to
> the docs, however minor, is bureaucracy gone mad. I think we can trust
> people to decide whether they're actually changing policy (use RTC) or
> just making a correctio
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's worth noting that in the dev vote:
>
> +1
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Charles Matthew Chen
> Craig L Russell
> Jeremias Maerki
> Jukka Zitting
>
> Carsten, Craig, Jeremias, and Jukka all cast binding votes
FWIW, that v
On 7/30/08, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 12:52, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> I think its the other way round - requiring a vote for any change to
>> the docs, however minor, is bureaucracy gone mad. I think we can trust
>> people to decide whether they're act
