All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world. They have signed a legal
document, in order to be allowed to contribute to Apache, and thus this is
not a simple preference issue.
Regards,
Marnie
On 3/5/08, Carl Trieloff
Shouldn't Qpid Status page (news section) have information regarding
releases, voting new committers, etc These information help others to
have an idea of the project dynamics ? See example [1].
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany.html
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Carl Trieloff <[
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world.
Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
than as part of their jobs? If so, they should be considered as
independents. If
On 05/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
> > disclosing their employer in Apache world.
>
>
> Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
>
Another option would be to not consider the people that cannot disclose
their employers when considering the diversity of the project. If
there are 15 people, and 5 cannot disclose their employer, only consider
the diversity of the remaining people.
Kind of the "err on the side of caution
sebb wrote:
On 05/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
> All,
>
> Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
> disclosing their employer in Apache world.
Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
Marnie McCormack wrote:
> Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
> disclosing their employer in Apache world. They have signed a legal
> document, in order to be allowed to contribute to Apache, and thus this is
> not a simple preference issue.
Mind you, they a
Roland Weber wrote:
> If contributing to the project is part of their job responsibilities,
> they should be required to disclose the employer.
That has not been made a stringent requirement, but see my response to
Melanie for what *is* a requirement.
--- Noel
Daniel Kulp write:
> a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
that]
> all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
employees.
> I think the above should provide enough information about the health and
> diversity of the community that actually wo
On Mar 5, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Marnie McCormack wrote:
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult
position
disclosing their employer in Apache world. They have signed a legal
document, in order to be allowed to contribute to Apache, and thus
this is
not a simple prefere
10 matches
Mail list logo
