On Nov 22, 2007 7:09 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2007 9:14 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I would agree with reviewing committers at graduation, but how do we
> > > implement that?
> >
> > I would say that this depends on the judgment of the
On Nov 23, 2007 9:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 7:09 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ask people to self nominate
> That sounds reasonable but is it ok to do that? Its quite hard to remove a
> committer from a real Apache project, are incubati
Hi All,
Can I close this vote on monday evening at 6.00 EST?
The vote has been open from Tuesday evening (after fixing all licensing
issues).
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 21, 2007 10:50 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is my renewed vote +1.
>
> Paul
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:48 PM,
Hello Kaushik,
kaushik sarkar wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I worked for Kazeon Search Engine. Where it uses Java Lucene Library.
> I am interested to work for it's c counter part. Please provide me necessary
> information and pointer to start from.
I take it you are referring to this retired podling:
>
> > That sounds reasonable but is it ok to do that? Its quite hard to remove
> a
> > committer from a real Apache project, are incubating committers
> different
> > and its ok to just ask who wants to be included at graduation?
>
I think that is a viable option to make a clear division between i
