Re: [DISCUSS] Community diversity: current concerns and suggestions for improvement

On Nov 19, 2007 8:05 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...Some of the discussion here to me seems to be backward: adding > constraints to the entry of a podling to the incubator... Agreed, we shouldn't add more constraints than needed. > ...A couple of additional comments below...

Karma to commit IP Clearance form

Hi incubator PMC. Could I please have karma to commit an IP clearance form to SVN. Thanks, Cameron (username cam) -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: Karma to commit IP Clearance form

Cameron, the directory for the IP clearance forms seems to be restricted to members, PMC chairs, the apsite group and the incubator projects. You can also just send the XML file to me and I'll handle it. Nevertheless, I think it would make sense to open at least the "ip-clearance" directory to al

Re: RAT set up [WAS Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] RAT to enter incubator]

On Nov 19, 2007 11:23 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Nov 19, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > On Nov 18, 2007 11:44 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Just one question. Why are you not a mentor for this project? I don't >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container

I'll update the proposal for changes from the discussion thus far and bing it to a vote ASAP. Meanwhile, initial (and gnarly, following bad is good for open source ;-) seeder code: http://people.apache.org/~brianm/shindig.tgz -Brian On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: S

Re: [DISCUSS] Community diversity: current concerns and suggestions for improvement

> I would agree with reviewing committers at graduation, but how do we > implement that? I would say that this depends on the judgment of the mentors, and it is probably more important to evaluate the role they would be playing in the project once it is over to Apache, than what happened before en

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

Hi All, We have resolved the licensing issues and updated the NOTICE and LICENSE files. The the new release candidates are available at the same location. The keys and svn tag can be accessed using the same URL's as well. Regards, Rajith On Nov 16, 2007 1:42 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECT

Buildr, Ruby license and packaging

Hi, The Buildr podling which entered incubation recently needs to address the problem of releasing Ruby code under the ASF. There are basically two questions that we'll need to answer before being able to do any release: 1. As most Ruby libraries reuse the Ruby license [1], in which category (

Fwd: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

Oops. Accidentally sent this to Rajith directly, rather than to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --kevan Begin forwarded message: From: Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 19, 2007 5:15:50 PM EST To: Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release On Nov 16, 2007

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Hi All, We have resolved the licensing issues and updated the NOTICE and LICENSE files. The the new release candidates are available at the same location. The keys and svn tag can be accessed using the same URL's as well. Hi Rajith, The

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

Thanks Kevan. Appreciate your help in reviewing and helping us through the licensing issues. Regards, Rajith On Nov 20, 2007 6:54 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have resolved the licensing issues and update