Re: PPMC docs query

2007-01-25 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, I think for a while we used PPMC and (P)PMC interchange-ably. We've more or less standardized on PPMC now, so the docs should probably be updated. Yoav On 1/24/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The PPMC docs ( http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html ) currently say: "Onl

Re: PPMC docs query

2007-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 1/25/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hola, I think for a while we used PPMC and (P)PMC interchange-ably. We've more or less standardized on PPMC now, so the docs should probably be updated. +1 probably needs a little care since some of the older guides use PMC to mean IPMC. i'd

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Thilo Goetz
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi Thilo, I was also getting me into the signing and since we (the Trinidad podling) use Maven2, I found this useful as well http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-gpg-plugin/ -M Thanks, I'll check that out. The documentation is a bit on the short side. Does it g

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
here it goes http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidadbuild/maven-faces-plugin/incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT/ -M On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi Thilo, > > I was also getting me into the signing and since we (

Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Thilo Goetz
Hi, I have recently started to familiarize myself with release signing for the upcoming UIMA release. I have documented my experiences on our web site, for developers here: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/distribution.html (section "Signing a distribution") and for users here: http://in

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Thilo Goetz
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: here it goes http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidadbuild/maven-faces-plugin/incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT/ Hi Matthias, you certainly have an abundance of signature files there. maven-faces-plugin-incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT.jar.asc.a

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, That's cool, and very considerate of you to take the time to document your process. Thank you. However, I'm not sure that we need to duplicate what's already documented and followed by most ASF projects: http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases and its links. Instead, we should work to update,

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi Thilo, I was also getting me into the signing and since we (the Trinidad podling) use Maven2, I found this useful as well http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-gpg-plugin/ -M On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have recently started to familiarize myself with release

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
hello, I was wondering too, but it finally does something for maven-faces-plugin-incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT.jar.asc.md5 that's all I want for now. Perhaps I can exclude some of them in future ;) On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > here it goes > > ht

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Thilo Goetz
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hola, That's cool, and very considerate of you to take the time to document your process. Thank you. However, I'm not sure that we need to duplicate what's already documented and followed by most ASF projects: http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases and its links. Instead, we s

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so what do you propose? The "signing releases" page does have all the info, but it's not very newbie friendly. I propose that instead of rewriting a new set of docs from scratch, you (or whoever is interested) submit patches against the

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > here it goes > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidadbuild/maven-faces-plugin/incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT/ > Hi Matthias, you certainly have an abundance of signature files t

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 1/25/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hola, On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so what do you propose? The "signing releases" page does have all the > info, but it's not very newbie friendly. I propose that instead of rewriting a new set of docs from scratch, yo

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hola, > That's cool, and very considerate of you to take the time to document > your process. Thank you. > > However, I'm not sure that we need to duplicate what's already > documented and followed by most ASF projects: > h

Re: Write-up on release signing/verification

2007-01-25 Thread Leo Simons
On Jan 25, 2007, at 8:07 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so what do you propose? please go ahead and create a patch :-) yay! We always need more (capable!) people to maintain these docs :) The apache website is maintained in xdoc form using

Board response to January Incubator PMC Report

2007-01-25 Thread Cliff Schmidt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Incubator PMC, On behalf of the Board, I want to thank you for the latest status report. There was one part of the report we would like to follow-up on: The report on Heraldry mentions a "single l

Re: PPMC docs query

2007-01-25 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/25/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/25/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola, > I think for a while we used PPMC and (P)PMC interchange-ably. We've > more or less standardized on PPMC now, so the docs should probably be > updated. +1 probably needs a