Account request - Venkat for Tuscany

**Tuscany has voted in Venkat as a committer, could an account be created for him please. Preferred userid: svkrish Full Name: S Venkatakrishnan Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/

[VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0-incubating

The ServiceMix community voted on and approved to release the 3.0-incubating version [1]. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish this release. The release / download page is available at [2]: [1] h

Request accound for Grant McDonald

Please create an account for Grant McDonald Preferred userid: grantm Full Name: Grant Matthew McDonald Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: servicemix (incubator) ICLA is on file. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Code donation for ServiceMix

Some time ago, Bull as proposed to give its eclipse plugin set, named Cimero to ServiceMix. AFAIK, Bull have faxed a CCLA a while ago. Could someone check that this CCLA has been received ? Is there any other thing to do so that we can import the code base in SVN ? Some informations can be foun

Re: Code donation for ServiceMix

On 9/20/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some time ago, Bull as proposed to give its eclipse plugin set, named Cimero to ServiceMix. AFAIK, Bull have faxed a CCLA a while ago. Could someone check that this CCLA has been received ? Is there any other thing to do so that we can imp

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0-incubating

+1 On 9/20/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The ServiceMix community voted on and approved to release the 3.0-incubating version [1]. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish this rele

Re: [VOTE] accept UIMA as a podling

On 9/20/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The only mistake here is the initial proposal might have assumed that people had a understanding of the topic area. this is why in the draft guide http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html splitting the initial proposal into several s

Re: [VOTE] accept UIMA as a podling

On 9/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:07:33PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote: > Of course, the fact that you had to be explicitly asked to explain > what the project does in the mailing list discussion doesn't bode well > in and of itself. My objection

Re: [doc] call for feedback for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html

On 9/19/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's really good, I like the template a lot. It will probably be very helpful. And I agree that a TOC would be helpful. On 9/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, what about a TOC at the beginning that links to the

Re: [doc] call for feedback for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html

On 9/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The other thing that I would find helpful is to change the color of the examples and commentary. They are way too similar. Maybe one of them should be boxed with a dark-color background? It's a minor nit, but I think if we can make th

Re: [doc] call for feedback for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html

On 9/20/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i've had some negative comments about my obsession with TOCs in the past but one is probably justified here. they are a PITA to maintain so i'll probably add a new element to the generation template... =) i could also port the sitem

Re: [doc] call for feedback for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html

On 9/20/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: well spotted and a good point i've replaced the light blue with a navy and it looks fine on my LCD. once the site has sync'd take a look and see if the contrast is ok now. Much better! Thanks. -- justin ---

Re: Request accound for Grant McDonald

Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please create an account for Grant McDonald > > Preferred userid: grantm > Full Name: Grant Matthew McDonald > Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Requested Karma for: servicemix (incubator) > > ICLA is on file. Is there a

Re: Request accound for Grant McDonald

The vote thread was on servicemix-private PPMC list, but the annoucement was made on the dev list, see [1] [1] http://www.nabble.com/-ANNOUNCE--Welcome-Grant-McDonald-as-our-newest-committer-tf2114447.html#a5830097 On 9/20/06, Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Request accound for Grant McDonald

Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Please create an account for Grant McDonald >> >> Preferred userid: grantm >> Full Name: Grant Matthew McDonald >> Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Requested Karma for: serv

Re: source audit tool?

On 9/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/19/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to use this as part of the run-up for Tuscany's next > release. > Did you check this in somewhere and if so where? i've been having a bit of a think about whether comm

Re: [VOTE] accept UIMA as a podling

Greetings, I understand from the message traffic that there are some concerns about the current state of the UIMA proposal, but I'd like to offer my support (and my hope that the issues with the proposal are resolved). Carnegie Mellon has been building and deploying text analysis programs us

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 4.1 release of ActiveMQ's maven plugins

+1 -Brian On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: Howdy ActiveMQ Mentors... you know who you are :) So far I think we have 2 binding +1's from: +1 Robert Burrell Donkin +1 James Strachan I know you guys are probably busy, but could you please take a moment and review the binaries?

Re: [VOTE] accept UIMA as a podling

On 9/18/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: as per Garrett's suggestion. > [X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: My only condition for acceptance is that someone explain UIMA to me over beer at AC. =) Goo

Re: [VOTE] accept UIMA as a podling

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: My only condition for acceptance is that someone explain UIMA to me over beer at AC. =) Good luck! -- justin I'm planning on attending AC (Wednesday thru Friday), and would love to explain UIMA to all that are interested! -- Marshall Schor ---

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Sep 20 23:53:08 2006

APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki