On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 22:41 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
> vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
> weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
>
> So what say ye?
>
> [X] +1 Gr
On 6 Dec 2005, at 06:45, Kenneth Tam wrote:
Specifically, I think the goal of providing a language/platform
neutral service assembly layer that's backed by an extensible set of
app developer models (with a shared conceptual framework) for
specific
languages/technologies, is something distinct
> Hi,
>
> I have been leveraging a wide range of open source projects in an
> enterprise
> environment for more then 10 years. During this time, I have developed a
> rich
> understanding of both the positive and negative implications of doing so.
> I
> am currently working at Merck and Co. Inc
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:59 PM, Kenneth Tam wrote:
I've rewritten the rationale to be substantially more direct:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TuscanyProposal
Robert's point is well taken, as we've been socializing this idea in
various circles and justifying a business case was definitely a par
+1
Thomas
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a vote. There
has been no concern or objection noted in the last two weeks, so I'll assume
that people are comfortable with this.
So what say ye?
[ ] +1 Graduate JDO f
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a vote.
There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two weeks, so
I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
So what say ye?
[X] +1 Graduate JDO from the Apache Incubator to be a part
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(sorry if you see this a second time... I never saw the first one...)
I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
I would like to offer development help on the proposed Tuscany SOA project.
>From the Tuscany proposal, I would be interested in helping with the
following technology areas:
* integration with Axis2 policy implementations for security,
transactions, reliable messaging
* support heterogeneous
On Monday 05 December 2005 11:41, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
> vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
> weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
>
> So what say ye?
+1, non-binding
Ni
Lance,
the WSS4J project started some activities to use
the current WS-Commons Policy implmentation as the
base to enhance WSS4J with WS-SecurityPolicy.
To avoid double work (and also to give me a quick start
into the Policy stuff :-) ) I would like to synchronize
these activities, share ideas e
10 matches
Mail list logo
