Paul Hammant wrote:
OK, if we're keen about Dependency Injection, we'd need to change a
lot. The basic FtpConfig component should have little knowledge of
UserManager (and others), and no coupling to it...
If we do aim for a DI/IoC approach (and I think we should), should we
choose a DI
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Remind me if no one else gets to it first. As I write this note, I'm
sitting at LAX, without connectivity. I have no idea when this will
actually get posted.
Now that it appears that FTPServer has happily come back to life, I would
like to see a greater community grow ar
Paul Hammant wrote:
OK, if we're keen about Dependency Injection, we'd need to change a
lot. The basic FtpConfig component should have little knowledge of
UserManager (and others), and no coupling to it...
If we do aim for a DI/IoC approach (and I think we should), should we
choose a DI im
Actually, I think that perhaps we might want to look at OSGi, and supporting
FTPserver as an OSGi bundle.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 02 October 2005 06:52, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Paul Hammant wrote:
> > OK, if we're keen about Dependency Injection, we'd need to change a
> > lot. The basic FtpConfig component should have little knowledge of
> > UserManager (and others), and no coupling to it...
>
> If we do aim for
