Once upon a time in Jakarta, all the votes were held on the various
public dev lists, including votes for new Committers.
I've seen rererences on communty@ and members@ that other projects
prefer to have the Committer votes on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've also seen references to some projects "informal
Ted Husted wrote:
> Is it mandatory that Committer votes be held on a public list?
No.
> is the decision between pmc@ and dev@ left to the discretion of a PMC?
Yes. However, discussion of committers (or other personnel issues) on
public lists is discouraged. The PMC should either discuss and
At 09:16 AM 6/21/2005, Ted Husted wrote:
>Is it mandatory that Committer votes be held on a public list?
The Foundation is modeled after the "Apache Group", which always
held discussion of individuals on private 'core' lists.
>Or is the decision between pmc@ and dev@ left to the discretion of a
