Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> It just doesn't make sense to me to tell a community that believes it
has
>>> a "1.0" quality product that they have to call it a "test snapshot".
>>
>> Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal?
>
> If we are keeping a project in incubati
Hi,
James Carman wrote:
I would like to start a biological object model process (I need to come up
with a catchier name) and I think ASF would be a great place for it.
Have you looked at the Open Bioinformatics Foundation
(http://www.open-bio.org/)? They are not ASF, but they have a working,
>From what I understand, the BioJava project doesn't really provide
persistence for biological objects, which is something that I would want in
a model/platform. My idea is to use something like Hibernate or JDO to
actually persist the data. Also, the last "recent update" for BioJava was
from May
I've been a bit hung up on the idea that since Derby has done several
"official releases" from within the Incubator (e.g., Version 10.0.2.1 at
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html#Official+Releases
), Beehive should be able to do the same thing. I think a lot of us
have been
Richard Feit wrote:
> I've been a bit hung up on the idea that since Derby has done several
> "official releases" from within the Incubator (e.g., Version 10.0.2.1 at
> http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html#Official+Releases
> ), Beehive should be able to do the same thing. I thi
Richard Feit wrote:
> I've been a bit hung up on the idea that since Derby has done several
> "official releases" from within the Incubator (e.g., Version 10.0.2.1 at
> http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html#Official+Releases
I can appreciate that view. I hadn't noticed the use o
On 6/8/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, versioning schemes such as:
>
> M.mQB
>
> where M == major, m == minor, Q in [D:Development, A:Alpha, B:Beta,
> R:Release], and B == Build# encode the release type. I supposed that 1.0m1
> represents a milestone.
>
> In any event, I
It seems like adding "Incubating" to the name of the release would
prevent this from smelling like official ASF code, or even from smelling
like fully-baked code. I think we're all for that -- our main goal is
to fulfill the requirements for exiting the Incubator, not to languish
there doing n
IMO its a great idea (assuming nothing like that exists) but how can ASF
help you given that the incubator is meant to bring in existing projects
with working code rather than ideas?
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 18:35 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I would like to start a biologi
Sanjiva,
I'm glad you like the idea. I think there is a need for something like this
in the bioinformatics community.
Well, I could start modeling some classes that I'm somewhat familiar with.
Unfortunately, though, I'm not a bioinformatician, so I'm not exactly the
person who should be doing
Richard Feit wrote:
> it would be very healthy for us to focus solely on exiting
> the Incubator. We are totally committed to building a real
> dev community around Beehive
Neither of those was in doubt. :-)
> we need all the guidance we can get in achieving that.
How has it been going? Have
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Richard Feit wrote:
it would be very healthy for us to focus solely on exiting
the Incubator. We are totally committed to building a real
dev community around Beehive
Neither of those was in doubt. :-)
we need all the guidance we can get in achieving tha
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
13 matches
Mail list logo
