Here is my opinion on the whole release issue, which has not changed
in 18 months since the first big discussion of releases and incubation
branding.
Full Disclosure: While this is my opinion as a member of the
Incubator PMC, it is not necessarily the consensus of the PMC. In
addition, I was onc
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Here is my opinion on the whole release issue, which has not changed
> in 18 months since the first big discussion of releases and incubation
> branding.
[snip]
Maybe folks are confused by this sentence in the 'Minimum Exit
Requirements' section.
http://incubator.apache.
On 6/7/05, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+Requirements
>
>
> Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official Release.
> Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans are OK
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> >
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+R
equirements
> > Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official
Release.
> > Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans are OK.
On 07.06.2005, at 22:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal?
Look, maybe this is hard to understand, especially if people are
coming from
an enviroment focused on code quality first, but this isn't about
the state
of the code. It is about the state of
All,
I would like to start a biological object model process (I need to come up
with a catchier name) and I think ASF would be a great place for it. I
currently work with a product called GKP (Genomics Knowledge Platform) from
a company called Xteric and it works fairly well, but it is not ope
I meant "biological object model project." Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:35 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Biological Object Model Project
All,
I would like to start a biological object model proce
On 6/7/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It just doesn't make sense to me to tell a community that believes it has
>> a "1.0" quality product that they have to call it a "test snapshot".
>
> Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal?
All of those terms (or at least the fi
