peter royal wrote:
On Nov 9, 2003, at 3:59 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
At the end a community vote decides the codebase to adopt or we can as
well be left with just one proposal.
This is what I had in mind from the beginning; what do you think?
Repo != a codebase. Its just a spec.
[EMAIL PROTE
On Sunday, November 9, 2003, at 09:02 AM, peter royal wrote:
On Nov 9, 2003, at 1:52 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
We need CPAN, or apt-get, or fink, or something slightly more
dependency aware but not so much so that we sit on our thumbs waiting
for it to happen.
... there are no methods of stori
On Sunday, November 9, 2003, at 02:50 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 01:08, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason:
I must confess that I am intrigued by your approach to
collabor
The /www/incubator.apache.org/ directory tree on minotaur contains
both a checked-out incubator-site *and* the generated output of a
forrestbot via incubator. It obviously can't be both.
Personally, I've had my fill of this kind of crap being left on
our public infrastructure. I shouldn't have to
