Re: xmlbeans project

2003-07-24 Thread Paul Hammant
Ted, Ok, Is the issue here being @xml vs being @incubator? If they need to be @incubator that's totally fine with me. Or is there something that I'm missing? IIUC it's all there is to it. If you look at this message in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list it seems clear that they went into

Re: xmlbeans project

2003-07-24 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I do not see much sense in moving mailing lists arround. Please > >> avoid such needless work. > > Then incubating would be needless work anyhow, we would make the project > go live as final right away 8-> I do not hope that the main sense of the

[VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeansproject )

2003-07-24 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Since IMHO this has been already discussed enough and different POVs remain, I ask for a vote on the following. What should we use as a policy in creating resources for incubating projects? [ ] project-subproject CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] incubato

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re:xmlbeans project )

2003-07-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create the lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling other people what do do == policy). If they rely on the XML project and the XMLBeans folks to do things then they should allow the XML project and XMLBeans

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-24 Thread Erik Abele
On 24/07/2003, at 03:48, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Since IMHO this has been already discussed enough and different POVs remain, I ask for a vote on the following. What should we use as a policy in creating resources for incubating projects? ... I'm not on the incubator pmc but I'd like to see

Re: xmlbeans project

2003-07-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/24/03 4:21 AM, "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ted, > Ok, Is the issue here being @xml vs being @incubator? If they need to be @incubator that's totally fine with me. Or is there something that I'm missing? >>> >>> >>> >>> IIUC it's all there is to i

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeansproject )

2003-07-24 Thread Ted Leung
This is embarrassing. How can we have incubated several projects and not have this worked out? No wonder people are complaining about the incubator. Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Since IMHO this has been already discussed enough and different POVs remain, I ask for a vote on the following. Wh

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-24 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 07:23 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create the lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling other people what do do == policy). If they rely on the XML project and the XMLBeans f

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-24 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Ted Leung wrote: This is embarrassing. How can we have incubated several projects and not have this worked out? No wonder people are complaining about the incubator. It was never this big of an issue then (and I still don't think it's that big of an

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-24 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
> This is embarrassing. How can we have incubated several projects and > not have this worked out? These problems are typical for self-incubating incubators ;-) Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio