Re: OpenSAML / Incubator-PMC

2003-03-03 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
My nonbinding -1 until the patent issues are resolved in a way that does not require those using the software to get seperate licenses. -Andy Davanum Srinivas wrote: Incubator PMC Folks, Can you please have a VOTE on OpenSAML? It's been so long since the process started Thanks, dims =

Re: OpenSAML / Incubator-PMC

2003-03-03 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
(my -1 is non-binding in the incubator, however I will write the board if the issue is pressed without these issues being resolved and you've received one negative opinion from a board member thus far) Davanum Srinivas wrote: Incubator PMC Folks, Can you please have a VOTE on OpenSAML? It's be

Re: OpenSAML / Incubator-PMC

2003-03-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Andrew, I just want the PMC to VOTE to take a stand (It could go either way, which is absolutely fine with me). At the least, I need to be able to tell the RSA folks that we dropped this idea because of the patent problems. Thanks, dims --- "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (my -

Re: OpenSAML / Incubator-PMC

2003-03-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 03/03/2003 16.09: Andrew, I just want the PMC to VOTE to take a stand (It could go either way, which is absolutely fine with me). At the least, I need to be able to tell the RSA folks that we dropped this idea because of the patent problems. I'm quite confident it woul